AFG
Price
$143.35
Change
+$1.97 (+1.39%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.91B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIGIP
Price
$15.77
Change
-$0.09 (-0.57%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFG vs SIGIP

AFG vs SIGIP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFG vs. SIGIP commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFG is a Buy and SIGIP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (AFG: $143.35 vs. SIGIP: $15.77)
Brand notoriety: AFG and SIGIP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFG: 91% vs. SIGIP: 2%
Market capitalization -- AFG: $11.91B vs. SIGIP: $0
AFG [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $11.91B. SIGIP’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $137.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIGIP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIGIP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the long-term than SIGIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIGIP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SIGIP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the short-term than SIGIP.

Price Growth

AFG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while SIGIP (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.53% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFG YTD gains are higher at: 7.552 vs. SIGIP (-2.388). AFG has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. SIGIP (999M). SIGIP has less debt than AFG: SIGIP (901M) vs AFG (1.82B). AFG has higher revenues than SIGIP: AFG (8.11B) vs SIGIP (5.41B).
AFGSIGIPAFG / SIGIP
Capitalization11.9BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.552-2.388-316%
P/E Ratio13.61N/A-
Revenue8.11B5.41B150%
Total Cash2.04B999M204%
Total Debt1.82B901M202%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFG: Fundamental Ratings
AFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFGSIGIP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIGIP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DCO163.50-1.55
-0.94%
Ducommun
EDIT3.16-0.10
-3.07%
Editas Medicine
SOWG3.73-0.18
-4.60%
Sow Good Inc.
TRUG1.22-0.07
-5.43%
TruGolf Holdings Inc.
DOCN123.32-7.17
-5.49%
DigitalOcean Holdings

AFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFG has been closely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFG jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFG
1D Price
Change %
AFG100%
+1.39%
AXS - AFG
74%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
THG - AFG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
HIG - AFG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
TRV - AFG
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
L - AFG
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
More

SIGIP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIGIP and AXS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIGIP and AXS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIGIP
1D Price
Change %
SIGIP100%
-0.57%
AXS - SIGIP
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
PRA - SIGIP
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFG - SIGIP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
HIG - SIGIP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
SIGI - SIGIP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More