AFRM
Price
$71.44
Change
+$3.45 (+5.07%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
24.11B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
AIOT
Price
$3.00
Change
+$0.05 (+1.69%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
402.01M
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs AIOT

AFRM vs AIOT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. AIOT commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and AIOT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($24.1B) has a higher market cap than AIOT($402M). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: -4.017 vs. AIOT (-43.609). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. AIOT (79.9M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.6B vs. AIOT (32.8M). AIOT has less debt than AFRM: AIOT (296M) vs AFRM (10B). AFRM has higher revenues than AIOT: AFRM (4.26B) vs AIOT (450M).
AFRMAIOTAFRM / AIOT
Capitalization24.1B402M5,995%
EBITDA1.25B79.9M1,564%
Gain YTD-4.017-43.6099%
P/E Ratio12.92N/A-
Revenue4.26B450M947%
Total Cash2.6B32.8M7,936%
Total Debt10B296M3,378%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIOT: Fundamental Ratings
AIOT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMAIOT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $71.44 vs. AIOT: $3.00)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and AIOT are both not notable
AFRM represents the Savings Banks, while AIOT is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 118% vs. AIOT: 50%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $24.11B vs. AIOT: $402.01M
AFRM [@Savings Banks] is valued at $24.11B. AIOT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $402.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $1.46M to $696.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $291 to $238.27B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $34.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while AIOT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AIOT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AFRM and AIOT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AIOT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • AIOT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIOT is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while AIOT (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

AIOT is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.79% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AIOT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YHGJ2.700.05
+1.89%
Yunhong Green CTI Ltd.
DGX235.023.88
+1.68%
Quest Diagnostics
SMID24.490.26
+1.07%
Smith-Midland Corp
BCSF11.470.07
+0.61%
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
LBTYA10.47-0.15
-1.41%
Liberty Global Ltd

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+5.07%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
+6.80%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
UPST - AFRM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
SOFI - AFRM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More

AIOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIOT has been loosely correlated with ZETA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AIOT jumps, then ZETA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIOT
1D Price
Change %
AIOT100%
+1.69%
ZETA - AIOT
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
AFRM - AIOT
47%
Loosely correlated
+5.07%
TLS - AIOT
43%
Loosely correlated
-15.60%
SOUN - AIOT
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
KVYO - AIOT
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More