AFRM
Price
$70.95
Change
+$2.15 (+3.12%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
23.42B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CTLP
Price
$10.67
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
786.35M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs CTLP

Header iconAFRM vs CTLP Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs CTLPBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$70.95
Change+$2.15 (+3.12%)
Volume$2.15M
Capitalization23.42B
Cantaloupe
Price$10.67
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$188.53K
Capitalization786.35M
AFRM vs CTLP Comparison Chart in %
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CTLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. CTLP commentary
Nov 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a StrongBuy and CTLP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 30, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $70.95 vs. CTLP: $10.67)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and CTLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 36% vs. CTLP: 24%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $23.42B vs. CTLP: $786.35M
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $23.42B. CTLP’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $786.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.66T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTLP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CTLP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTLP is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTLP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CTLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the short-term than CTLP.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а +10.21% price change this week, while CTLP (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

CTLP is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+3.01% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($23.4B) has a higher market cap than CTLP($786M). AFRM has higher P/E ratio than CTLP: AFRM (102.83) vs CTLP (13.34). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 16.502 vs. CTLP (12.198). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 712M vs. CTLP (39.2M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. CTLP (46.3M). CTLP has less debt than AFRM: CTLP (40.6M) vs AFRM (7.85B). AFRM has higher revenues than CTLP: AFRM (3.22B) vs CTLP (293M).
AFRMCTLPAFRM / CTLP
Capitalization23.4B786M2,977%
EBITDA712M39.2M1,816%
Gain YTD16.50212.198135%
P/E Ratio102.8313.34771%
Revenue3.22B293M1,100%
Total Cash2.23B46.3M4,808%
Total Debt7.85B40.6M19,342%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTLP: Fundamental Ratings
CTLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMCTLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CTLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNLVX22.410.14
+0.63%
Dunham Large Cap Value N
MITBX37.090.22
+0.60%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr B
GAMNX11.890.06
+0.51%
Gabelli Global Mini Mites AAA
BEQAX39.110.19
+0.49%
American Century Equity Growth A
PQSCX22.81-0.04
-0.18%
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value C

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+3.12%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
+12.27%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+7.82%
NET - AFRM
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
COMP - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

CTLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTLP has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTLP jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTLP
1D Price
Change %
CTLP100%
-0.19%
AFRM - CTLP
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.12%
NET - CTLP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
CNDT - CTLP
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
AIOT - CTLP
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
EXLS - CTLP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
More