AFRM
Price
$89.43
Change
+$6.35 (+7.64%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
29.12B
50 days until earnings call
SKLZ
Price
$7.19
Change
+$0.08 (+1.13%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
110.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs SKLZ

Header iconAFRM vs SKLZ Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs SKLZBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$89.43
Change+$6.35 (+7.64%)
Volume$10.28M
Capitalization29.12B
Skillz
Price$7.19
Change+$0.08 (+1.13%)
Volume$74.83K
Capitalization110.22M
AFRM vs SKLZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. SKLZ commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a StrongBuy and SKLZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $89.43 vs. SKLZ: $7.19)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and SKLZ are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while SKLZ is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 134% vs. SKLZ: 68%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $29.12B vs. SKLZ: $110.22M
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $29.12B. SKLZ’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $110.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.83T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $13.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AFRM and SKLZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKLZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SKLZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the short-term than SKLZ.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а +4.13% price change this week, while SKLZ (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -4.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +4.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+4.64% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Electronics/Appliances (+3.30% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($29.1B) has a higher market cap than SKLZ($110M). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 46.847 vs. SKLZ (42.942). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 712M vs. SKLZ (-39.36M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. SKLZ (301M). SKLZ has less debt than AFRM: SKLZ (137M) vs AFRM (7.85B). AFRM has higher revenues than SKLZ: AFRM (3.22B) vs SKLZ (106M).
AFRMSKLZAFRM / SKLZ
Capitalization29.1B110M26,455%
EBITDA712M-39.36M-1,809%
Gain YTD46.84742.942109%
P/E Ratio596.20N/A-
Revenue3.22B106M3,042%
Total Cash2.23B301M740%
Total Debt7.85B137M5,732%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMSKLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRYAF0.07N/A
N/A
Berjaya Corporation BHD
PTTWF2.05N/A
N/A
Orange Polska SA
ZHYBF2.02N/A
N/A
Zhong Yuan Bio-Technology Holdings Ltd
NPNYY7.42-0.05
-0.67%
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
VRRCF0.01N/A
-29.94%
VR Resources Ltd.

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+7.64%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+4.97%
COMP - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
HOOD - AFRM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More