AGEN
Price
$7.91
Change
+$1.28 (+19.31%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
328.98M
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CYCN
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
15.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGEN vs CYCN

AGEN vs CYCN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGEN vs. CYCN commentary
Jul 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGEN is a StrongBuy and CYCN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 31, 2026
Stock price -- (AGEN: $7.91 vs. CYCN: $3.50)
Brand notoriety: AGEN and CYCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGEN: 69% vs. CYCN: 24%
Market capitalization -- AGEN: $328.98M vs. CYCN: $15.16M
AGEN [@Biotechnology] is valued at $328.98M. CYCN’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $15.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $122.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AGEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CYCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AGEN and CYCN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGEN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYCN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGEN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CYCN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AGEN is a better buy in the short-term than CYCN.

Price Growth

AGEN (@Biotechnology) experienced а +27.79% price change this week, while CYCN (@Biotechnology) price change was -3.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2126.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

AGEN is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-1.97% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGEN($329M) has a higher market cap than CYCN($15.2M). CYCN YTD gains are higher at: 175.591 vs. AGEN (151.911). AGEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 127M vs. CYCN (-6.73M). AGEN has more cash in the bank: 35M vs. CYCN (2.82M). CYCN has less debt than AGEN: CYCN (0) vs AGEN (41.1M). AGEN has higher revenues than CYCN: AGEN (124M) vs CYCN (1.99M).
AGENCYCNAGEN / CYCN
Capitalization329M15.2M2,164%
EBITDA127M-6.73M-1,888%
Gain YTD151.911175.59187%
P/E Ratio3.85N/A-
Revenue124M1.99M6,222%
Total Cash35M2.82M1,240%
Total Debt41.1M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGEN vs CYCN: Fundamental Ratings
AGEN
CYCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4778
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7527

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYCN's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGEN (93) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CYCN’s stock grew significantly faster than AGEN’s over the last 12 months.

CYCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AGEN (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CYCN’s stock grew similarly to AGEN’s over the last 12 months.

CYCN's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as AGEN (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CYCN’s stock grew similarly to AGEN’s over the last 12 months.

AGEN's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CYCN (36) in the null industry. This means that AGEN’s stock grew similarly to CYCN’s over the last 12 months.

AGEN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYCN (100) in the null industry. This means that AGEN’s stock grew significantly faster than CYCN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGENCYCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CYCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDNT63.370.15
+0.24%
RadNet
SBR72.75-0.37
-0.51%
Sabine Royalty Trust
AFL128.67-0.88
-0.68%
Aflac
GTIM1.41-0.01
-0.70%
Good Times Restaurants
PPIH23.23-2.18
-8.58%
Perma-Pipe International Holdings

CYCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYCN has been loosely correlated with HRTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYCN jumps, then HRTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYCN
1D Price
Change %
CYCN100%
N/A
HRTX - CYCN
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
ELAB - CYCN
40%
Loosely correlated
-6.96%
BLRX - CYCN
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
AGEN - CYCN
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
GDTC - CYCN
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.48%
More