Advertisement
AGNT vs BPYPP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGNT is a Hold and BPYPP is a StrongBuy.
| AGNT | BPYPP | AGNT / BPYPP | |
| Capitalization | 673M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | -2.23M | 3.94B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -54.633 | 16.934 | -323% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.96B | 7.17B | 69% |
| Total Cash | 111M | 1.49B | 7% |
| Total Debt | 7K | 38.1B | 0% |
AGNT | BPYPP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BPYPP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGNT (74) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that BPYPP’s stock grew significantly faster than AGNT’s over the last 12 months.
BPYPP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AGNT (100) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that BPYPP’s stock grew similarly to AGNT’s over the last 12 months.
AGNT's SMR Rating (93) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as BPYPP (100) in the null industry. This means that AGNT’s stock grew similarly to BPYPP’s over the last 12 months.
BPYPP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGNT (83) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that BPYPP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGNT’s over the last 12 months.
AGNT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPYPP (100) in the null industry. This means that AGNT’s stock grew significantly faster than BPYPP’s over the last 12 months.
| AGNT | BPYPP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 48% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BPYPP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AGNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BPYPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGNT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BPYPP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AGNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BPYPP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AGNT (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while BPYPP (@Real Estate Development) price change was -1.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
AGNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-5.22% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
Advertisement
AGNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGNT has been loosely correlated with NMRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGNT jumps, then NMRK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGNT | 100% | +7.20% | ||
| NMRK - AGNT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| RMAX - AGNT | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| JLL - AGNT | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| COMP - AGNT | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| DOUG - AGNT | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||
BPYPP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPP has been loosely correlated with BPYPN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPP jumps, then BPYPN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPYPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPP | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| BPYPN - BPYPP | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| BPYPO - BPYPP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| DBRG - BPYPP | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| FTHM - BPYPP | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AGNT - BPYPP | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.20% | ||
More | ||||