AGQ
Price
$76.79
Change
+$1.67 (+2.22%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DGP
Price
$156.78
Change
+$0.79 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
99.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGQ vs DGP

AGQ vs DGP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) vs. DB Gold Double Long ETN (DGP)

Key Takeaways

  • AGQ provides 2x daily leveraged exposure to silver futures via the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while DGP delivers 2x daily exposure to an optimized gold futures index, resulting in distinct commodity focuses within precious metals.
  • Both products employ daily reset leverage, amplifying short-term moves but introducing compounding effects that can cause divergence from target multiples over longer periods.
  • AGQ carries a higher expense ratio of 0.95% compared to DGP’s 0.75%, reflecting differences in structure and issuer costs.
  • AGQ is structured as an ETF using futures and swaps, whereas DGP is an exchange-traded note (ETN) backed by Deutsche Bank, introducing issuer credit risk unique to the latter.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on precious metals with no equity holdings, positioning them as tactical tools rather than diversified core holdings.
  • Relative positioning favors cost efficiency and structure for DGP, while AGQ offers pure silver beta in a more liquid ETF wrapper.

Introduction

AGQ and DGP both target amplified daily returns in precious metals but diverge sharply in underlying commodity and product structure. They do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they represent alternative leveraged strategies for investors seeking exposure to silver versus gold price movements. In the current environment of fluctuating interest rates and commodity volatility, these funds appeal to tactical traders monitoring precious metals trends rather than long-term buy-and-hold portfolios.

ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) Overview

ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. The fund achieves this through futures contracts and swap agreements rather than holding physical silver. It maintains no traditional equity holdings and operates as a passive leveraged ETF with daily rebalancing. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. Key structural features include its focus on COMEX silver futures and daily reset mechanism, which suits short-term trading but requires careful monitoring due to volatility decay.

DB Gold Double Long ETN (DGP) Overview

DB Gold Double Long ETN (DGP) aims for two times (2x) the daily performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index – Optimum Yield Gold. This exchange-traded note (ETN) uses an optimized selection of gold futures contracts designed to mitigate contango effects. It carries an expense ratio of 0.75% and resets exposure daily. As an ETN, it relies on the creditworthiness of issuer Deutsche Bank rather than holding assets directly. The structure emphasizes passive, rules-based optimization within the gold futures curve, distinguishing it from unoptimized leveraged products.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the precious metals sector, driven by macroeconomic factors including inflation expectations, central bank policies, and geopolitical tensions that influence safe-haven demand. Gold and silver often respond to real interest rate movements and U.S. dollar strength, with silver exhibiting higher volatility due to its dual industrial and monetary roles. Recent market cycles have highlighted commodity rotation amid shifting growth outlooks, while regulatory oversight on derivatives and issuer credit remain ongoing considerations for leveraged products.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance of both products has tracked broader precious metals trends tied to interest rate expectations and currency movements. AGQ’s silver focus typically delivers higher beta and volatility compared to DGP’s gold exposure, leading to more pronounced swings during sector rotations. DGP’s optimized index may provide relative stability in contango environments, while AGQ’s futures-based approach captures spot silver dynamics more directly. Relative positioning highlights AGQ for aggressive silver bets and DGP for gold with potentially lower ongoing costs.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on leveraged commodity products may benefit from exploring the tool.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, optimized futures methodology, and balanced risk exposure within the gold segment, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to DGP for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and structural optimization in precious metals leverage. AGQ remains compelling for those targeting silver-specific momentum, though its higher costs and unoptimized futures exposure introduce additional considerations in prolonged holding scenarios.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AGQ vs. DGP commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGQ is a Hold and DGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGQ has more net assets: 1.42B vs. DGP (99.8M). DGP has a higher annual dividend yield than AGQ: DGP (-2.627) vs AGQ (-50.496). AGQ was incepted earlier than DGP: AGQ (18 years) vs DGP (19 years).
AGQDGPAGQ / DGP
Gain YTD-50.496-2.6271,922%
Net Assets1.42B99.8M1,421%
Total Expense Ratio1.29N/A-
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence18 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGQDGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
AGQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCEL15.890.30
+1.92%
FuelCell Energy Inc
RDNT75.491.21
+1.63%
RadNet
VLO390.424.99
+1.29%
Valero Energy Corp
TGHL0.95N/A
-0.34%
The Growhub Ltd
GENC17.93-0.14
-0.77%
Gencor Industries