Advertisement
AIFU vs WTW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFU is a Hold and WTW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AIFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WTW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIFU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIFU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WTW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AIFU (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -4.26% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +2.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -32.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
WTW is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Insurance Brokers/Services (-1.48% weekly)Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| AIFU | WTW | AIFU / WTW | |
| Capitalization | 270M | 28B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 424M | 2.02B | 21% |
| Gain YTD | -98.366 | 4.418 | -2,227% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.96 | 27.48 | 18% |
| Revenue | 3.36B | 9.48B | 35% |
| Total Cash | 1.5B | 1.42B | 105% |
| Total Debt | 304M | 5.94B | 5% |
AIFU | WTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIFU's Valuation (27) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (91) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.
AIFU's SMR Rating (42) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (89) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIFU (66) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.
| AIFU | WTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GCOW | 38.85 | 0.22 | +0.57% |
| Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | |||
| ITDH | 35.13 | 0.05 | +0.14% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETF | |||
| DJUL | 45.46 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Jul | |||
| TLTP | 22.64 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Amplify Bloomberg U.S.Trs 12% Prm IncETF | |||
| UFO | 30.23 | -0.77 | -2.49% |
| Procure Space ETF | |||
AIFU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFU and HUIZ have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFU and HUIZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIFU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU | 100% | -4.13% | ||
| HUIZ - AIFU | 20% Poorly correlated | -7.17% | ||
| ERIE - AIFU | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| WTW - AIFU | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| EHTH - AIFU | 7% Poorly correlated | -22.06% | ||
| CRVL - AIFU | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||
WTW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been closely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.