AIFU
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
269.5M
23 days until earnings call
WTW
Price
$312.07
Change
+$5.71 (+1.86%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.02B
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIFU vs WTW

Header iconAIFU vs WTW Comparison
Open Charts AIFU vs WTWBanner chart's image
AIFU
Price$0.14
Change-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Volume$78.37M
Capitalization269.5M
Willis Towers Watson Public
Price$312.07
Change+$5.71 (+1.86%)
Volume$589.38K
Capitalization28.02B
AIFU vs WTW Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFU vs. WTW commentary
May 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFU is a Hold and WTW is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFU: $0.14 vs. WTW: $312.07)
Brand notoriety: AIFU and WTW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFU: 3446% vs. WTW: 84%
Market capitalization -- AIFU: $269.5M vs. WTW: $28.02B
AIFU [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $269.5M. WTW’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $28.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WTW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTW is a better buy in the long-term than AIFU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIFU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIFU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WTW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AIFU is a better buy in the short-term than WTW.

Price Growth

AIFU (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а +12.93% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIFU is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

WTW is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (-0.81% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTW($28B) has a higher market cap than AIFU($270M). WTW has higher P/E ratio than AIFU: WTW (27.48) vs AIFU (4.96). WTW YTD gains are higher at: -0.101 vs. AIFU (-87.373). WTW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. AIFU (424M). AIFU has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. WTW (1.42B). AIFU has less debt than WTW: AIFU (304M) vs WTW (5.94B). WTW has higher revenues than AIFU: WTW (9.48B) vs AIFU (3.36B).
AIFUWTWAIFU / WTW
Capitalization270M28B1%
EBITDA424M2.02B21%
Gain YTD-87.373-0.10186,605%
P/E Ratio4.9627.4818%
Revenue3.36B9.48B35%
Total Cash1.5B1.42B105%
Total Debt304M5.94B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFU vs WTW: Fundamental Ratings
AIFU
WTW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
3290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIFU's Valuation (29) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (87) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

AIFU's SMR Rating (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (90) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIFU (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFUWTW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIP4.510.21
+4.88%
FTAI Infrastructure
SOPA1.230.05
+4.24%
Society Pass Incorporated
KIM21.120.17
+0.81%
Kimco Realty Corp
NHI75.870.50
+0.66%
National Health Investors
LAKE16.840.01
+0.06%
Lakeland Industries

AIFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFU and SLQT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFU and SLQT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFU
1D Price
Change %
AIFU100%
-11.02%
SLQT - AIFU
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
HUIZ - AIFU
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
EHTH - AIFU
16%
Poorly correlated
-6.65%
WTW - AIFU
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
ERIE - AIFU
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
More

WTW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been closely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTW
1D Price
Change %
WTW100%
+1.86%
AJG - WTW
67%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
BRO - WTW
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
MMC - WTW
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
AON - WTW
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
ERIE - WTW
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.75%
More