AIFU
Price
$0.37
Change
+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
269.5M
61 days until earnings call
WTW
Price
$313.24
Change
+$1.98 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
28.02B
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AIFU vs WTW

Header iconAIFU vs WTW Comparison
Open Charts AIFU vs WTWBanner chart's image
AIX
Price$0.37
Change+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Volume$2.89M
Capitalization269.5M
Willis Towers Watson Public
Price$313.24
Change+$1.98 (+0.64%)
Volume$441.9K
Capitalization28.02B
AIFU vs WTW Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFU vs. WTW commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFU is a Hold and WTW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFU: $0.37 vs. WTW: $313.24)
Brand notoriety: AIFU and WTW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFU: 415% vs. WTW: 65%
Market capitalization -- AIFU: $269.5M vs. WTW: $28.02B
AIFU [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $269.5M. WTW’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $28.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTW is a better buy in the long-term than AIFU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIFU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIFU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WTW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTW is a better buy in the short-term than AIFU.

Price Growth

AIFU (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -60.54% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -5.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIFU is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

WTW is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (-5.43% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTW($28B) has a higher market cap than AIFU($270M). WTW has higher P/E ratio than AIFU: WTW (27.48) vs AIFU (4.96). WTW YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. AIFU (-66.645). WTW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. AIFU (424M). AIFU has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. WTW (1.42B). AIFU has less debt than WTW: AIFU (304M) vs WTW (5.94B). WTW has higher revenues than AIFU: WTW (9.48B) vs AIFU (3.36B).
AIFUWTWAIFU / WTW
Capitalization270M28B1%
EBITDA424M2.02B21%
Gain YTD-66.6450.000-
P/E Ratio4.9627.4818%
Revenue3.36B9.48B35%
Total Cash1.5B1.42B105%
Total Debt304M5.94B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFU vs WTW: Fundamental Ratings
AIFU
WTW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5179
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
6792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10025
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIFU's Valuation (33) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (86) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

AIFU's SMR Rating (67) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as WTW (92) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIFU (98) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFUWTW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNF55.641.28
+2.35%
Fidelity National Financial
SMP30.670.61
+2.03%
Standard Motor Products
ALTO1.61-0.02
-1.23%
Alto Ingredients
VCEL58.67-0.95
-1.59%
Vericel Corp
KAVL1.11-0.11
-9.02%
Kaival Brands Innovations Group

AIFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFU and SLQT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFU and SLQT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFU
1D Price
Change %
AIFU100%
+7.91%
SLQT - AIFU
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.95%
HUIZ - AIFU
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
EHTH - AIFU
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
WTW - AIFU
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
BRO - AIFU
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

WTW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been loosely correlated with BRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then BRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTW
1D Price
Change %
WTW100%
+0.64%
BRO - WTW
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
AJG - WTW
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
MMC - WTW
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
AON - WTW
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
ERIE - WTW
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
More