AIFU
Price
$5.84
Change
+$0.96 (+19.67%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
269.5M
WTW
Price
$304.84
Change
+$3.03 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.02B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIFU vs WTW

Header iconAIFU vs WTW Comparison
Open Charts AIFU vs WTWBanner chart's image
AIFU
Price$5.84
Change+$0.96 (+19.67%)
Volume$962
Capitalization269.5M
Willis Towers Watson Public
Price$304.84
Change+$3.03 (+1.00%)
Volume$25.73K
Capitalization28.02B
AIFU vs WTW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFU vs. WTW commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFU is a Buy and WTW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AIFU: $4.88 vs. WTW: $301.81)
Brand notoriety: AIFU and WTW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Insurance Brokers/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFU: 212% vs. WTW: 137%
Market capitalization -- AIFU: $269.5M vs. WTW: $28.02B
AIFU [@Insurance Brokers/Services] is valued at $269.5M. WTW’s [@Insurance Brokers/Services] market capitalization is $28.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry ranges from $100.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Insurance Brokers/Services] industry is $21.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AIFU and WTW are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIFU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIFU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WTW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTW is a better buy in the short-term than AIFU.

Price Growth

AIFU (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а +22.61% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIFU is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

WTW is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Insurance Brokers/Services (+3.11% weekly)

Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTW($28B) has a higher market cap than AIFU($270M). WTW has higher P/E ratio than AIFU: WTW (27.48) vs AIFU (4.96). WTW YTD gains are higher at: -3.385 vs. AIFU (-98.891). WTW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. AIFU (424M). AIFU has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. WTW (1.42B). AIFU has less debt than WTW: AIFU (304M) vs WTW (5.94B). WTW has higher revenues than AIFU: WTW (9.48B) vs AIFU (3.36B).
AIFUWTWAIFU / WTW
Capitalization270M28B1%
EBITDA424M2.02B21%
Gain YTD-98.891-3.3852,921%
P/E Ratio4.9627.4818%
Revenue3.36B9.48B35%
Total Cash1.5B1.42B105%
Total Debt304M5.94B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AIFU vs WTW: Fundamental Ratings
AIFU
WTW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2065
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10027
SMR RATING
1..100
4190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AIFU's Valuation (28) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (87) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

AIFU's SMR Rating (41) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (90) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AIFU’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as AIFU (63) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

WTW's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIFU (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew significantly faster than AIFU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIFUWTW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIFU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEQFX4.69N/A
N/A
Monteagle Opportunity Equity Inv
MIISX7.40N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Income Stock Inv
OEGNX25.02N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth R
MMMPX24.27N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts R6
GISOX18.17N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak Intl Stalwarts Inv

AIFU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFU and SLQT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFU and SLQT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFU
1D Price
Change %
AIFU100%
-18.12%
SLQT - AIFU
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
HUIZ - AIFU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERIE - AIFU
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
WTW - AIFU
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
EHTH - AIFU
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
More

WTW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been closely correlated with BRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then BRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTW
1D Price
Change %
WTW100%
+1.01%
BRO - WTW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
AJG - WTW
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
MMC - WTW
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
AON - WTW
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
ERIE - WTW
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More