This comparison examines BRO and WTW, two leading insurance brokerage firms navigating a dynamic market shaped by economic shifts and sector consolidation. Investors and traders interested in financial services exposure, particularly in property and casualty insurance, risk management, and advisory solutions, will find value here. Amid recent earnings reports, strategic moves, and varying momentum, understanding their relative performance helps assess sector positioning and potential trade-offs in growth versus stability.
Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) is a diversified insurance agency and brokerage firm operating through Retail and Specialty Distribution segments. It markets property and casualty policies, employee benefits, and risk management services to commercial and individual clients across the U.S., U.K., and internationally.
In recent weeks, BRO reported impressive Q1 2026 results, with total revenues reaching $1.9 billion—a 35.4% increase year-over-year—and adjusted diluted EPS of $1.39, surpassing analyst expectations. Organic revenue growth was flat overall but up 2.2% including contingents. These figures underscore resilient demand for brokerage services amid market volatility. Shares have climbed about 17% YTD and 42% over the past year, though they remain below the 52-week high amid broader market pressures. Sentiment has been buoyed by the earnings beat and ongoing M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, such as asset purchases enhancing dealer services, positioning BRO for sustained expansion.
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) is a global advisory, broking, and solutions provider operating in Health, Wealth & Career and Risk & Broking segments. It offers consulting, insurance brokerage, and technology for pensions, health benefits, and risks like property, casualty, and cyber liabilities.
Recent market activity for WTW highlights strategic advancements, including new leadership to accelerate enterprise AI adoption and partnerships like with INEOS Grenadiers. The completion of the Newfront acquisition in January 2026 bolsters its U.S. middle-market presence and technology capabilities. Shares have risen around 12% YTD but only 3% over the past year, trading within a stable 52-week range. Performance reflects steady demand for risk solutions, tempered by sector competition, with lower volatility (beta of 0.63) supporting defensive appeal amid economic uncertainty.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots optimized for current market conditions. While Tickeron offers over 350 AI Trading Bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, only 25 make the trending list based on superior recent performance and suitability. These bots employ diverse strategies—from short-term scalping to long-term trend following—with varying win rates, average returns, and trade frequencies tailored to different risk profiles and timeframes. For instance, top bots target growth sectors with high-confidence signals. This dynamic ranking helps traders identify bots aligning with volatile environments like today's insurance sector shifts. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to deploy proven AI strategies effortlessly.
BRO and WTW share core business models in insurance brokerage but differ in emphasis: BRO leans on retail and wholesale distribution for property/casualty, while WTW integrates broader consulting in health, wealth, and specialized risks. Growth drivers contrast with BRO's organic revenue and U.S.-focused M&A versus WTW's global tech/AI investments and acquisitions.
Recent momentum favors BRO with stronger YTD gains and earnings growth, though WTW offers lower risk via reduced beta and stable pricing. Sector exposure is similar—sensitive to interest rates and catastrophe losses—but WTW diversifies into cyber and data center risks. Market sentiment tilts toward BRO for growth potential, balanced by WTW's valuation edge (lower P/E).
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BRO over WTW, driven by superior trend consistency from recent Q1 revenue acceleration and YTD outperformance. While WTW exhibits stability and emerging AI catalysts, BRO's growth positioning suggests higher probability of near-term upside in brokerage demand.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRO (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -28.73%.
BRO is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.
WTW is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| BRO | WTW | BRO / WTW | |
| Capitalization | 20.5B | 24.3B | 84% |
| EBITDA | 2.28B | 2.72B | 84% |
| Gain YTD | -26.543 | -22.778 | 117% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.97 | 14.85 | 128% |
| Revenue | 6.26B | 9.9B | 63% |
| Total Cash | 1B | 1.86B | 54% |
| Total Debt | 8.06B | 6.91B | 117% |
BRO | WTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WTW's Valuation (77) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BRO (79) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to BRO’s over the last 12 months.
BRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as WTW (94) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BRO’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's SMR Rating (45) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BRO (66) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to BRO’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BRO (63) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to BRO’s over the last 12 months.
BRO's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as WTW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BRO’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
| BRO | WTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 50% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRO has been closely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRO jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRO | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| AJG - BRO | 77% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| MRSH - BRO | 70% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| WTW - BRO | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| AON - BRO | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| BWIN - BRO | 48% Loosely correlated | +16.16% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been closely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTW | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| AJG - WTW | 72% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| AON - WTW | 71% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MRSH - WTW | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| BRO - WTW | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| GSHD - WTW | 44% Loosely correlated | +5.64% | ||
More | ||||