When evaluating opportunities in the global insurance brokerage and advisory sector, AON and WTW frequently appear at the top of investor watchlists. Both companies operate at the intersection of risk management, employee benefits consulting, and capital solutions — industries that have experienced sustained demand amid a complex and volatile macroeconomic environment. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to defensive, fee-based business models with recurring revenue streams, strong free cash flow generation, and disciplined capital return programs. Whether you are a long-term value investor or evaluating relative momentum, understanding how these two industry heavyweights compare on fundamentals, strategic direction, and market positioning can help inform your decision-making process.
AON is a Dublin-based global professional services firm specializing in risk capital and human capital solutions. The company operates through two primary segments: Risk Capital, which includes commercial risk, reinsurance, and health solutions, and Human Capital, which encompasses health, wealth, and talent advisory services. With approximately 60,000 employees worldwide, Aon serves clients in over 120 countries.
In recent months, Aon has demonstrated robust financial momentum. For full-year 2025, the company reported total revenue of $17.2 billion, representing 9% growth over the prior year, driven by 6% organic revenue growth. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) reached $17.07, up 9% year over year, while free cash flow climbed 14% to $3.2 billion — underscoring the durability of its cash-generative business model. The company's adjusted operating margin expanded to 32.4%, reflecting disciplined expense management and operating leverage from its Aon United strategy.
A significant catalyst has been the integration of NFP, a middle-market insurance brokerage acquired to bolster Aon's presence in the fast-growing mid-market segment. The company also successfully paid down $1.9 billion in debt during 2025, meeting its leverage target and positioning the balance sheet for future M&A (mergers and acquisitions) and shareholder returns. The Board of Directors raised the quarterly dividend for the 15th consecutive year, reinforcing confidence in sustained cash flow generation.
WTW, headquartered in London, is a leading global advisory, broking, and solutions firm. The company operates through two core segments: Health, Wealth & Career (HWC), which provides benefits delivery, retirement consulting, and talent advisory, and Risk & Broking (R&B), which encompasses corporate risk, insurance broking, and consulting technology solutions. WTW serves clients across more than 140 countries.
For full-year 2025, WTW reported revenue of $9.7 billion, a 2% decline on a reported basis due to the sale of TRANZACT, but organic revenue growth of 5% demonstrated underlying business strength. Adjusted diluted EPS rose 5% to $17.08, while adjusted operating margin improved 130 basis points to 25.2%. Notably, Q4 2025 adjusted operating margin reached 36.9%, highlighting the company's improving profitability trajectory. Free cash flow surged 22% to $1.55 billion, driven by operating margin expansion and the conclusion of its Transformation program cash outflows.
WTW has been actively reshaping its portfolio. The divestiture of TRANZACT, a direct-to-consumer health insurance marketplace, allowed the company to sharpen its strategic focus on core advisory and broking operations. Meanwhile, the acquisition of Newfront — expected to contribute approximately $250 million in post-close revenue — signals WTW's commitment to expanding its technology-enabled insurance capabilities. The company has guided for continued annual margin expansion, targeting 100 basis points of average annual improvement in the R&B segment over the next two years.
For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across various timeframes and market conditions. Only the most consistently effective and market-aligned bots earn a place in this exclusive Trending section. These bots employ distinct trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to mean reversion and breakout strategies — and many showcase track records with win rates consistently exceeding 65% to 85%, depending on the strategy and market regime. Each bot's performance, drawdown statistics, and traded tickers are transparently displayed, allowing users to evaluate alignment with their own investment approach. Whether you are interested in automating AON, WTW, or thousands of other stocks, exploring the Trending AI Robots may reveal systematic strategies suited to today's market environment.
While both AON and WTW compete in overlapping markets, several key differences define their investment profiles. Aon is the clear leader by scale — its $78 billion market capitalization and $17.2 billion in annual revenue dwarf WTW's approximately $28 billion market cap and $9.7 billion revenue base. Aon's larger platform provides greater geographic and product diversification, which can translate into more stable earnings during sector-specific downturns. Aon also generates nearly double the free cash flow ($3.2 billion vs. $1.55 billion), giving it superior capacity for share buybacks, dividend growth, and opportunistic M&A.
On profitability, the picture is nuanced. WTW's Q4 2025 adjusted operating margin of 36.9% edged out Aon's 35.5%, suggesting WTW has made meaningful progress in streamlining its cost structure post-TRANZACT. However, on a full-year basis, Aon's 32.4% adjusted operating margin comfortably surpassed WTW's 25.2%, indicating more consistent operational efficiency. WTW's margin profile is improving rapidly, with the Transformation program now largely complete and the Newfront acquisition expected to contribute synergies over time.
In terms of growth drivers, Aon is leveraging its 3x3 Plan to accelerate organic revenue expansion through data-driven insights and its Aon Business Services platform, while expanding into the middle market via the NFP acquisition. WTW is concentrating on deepening its specialty broking capabilities and expanding its technology-enabled offerings through Newfront. Both companies share exposure to favorable industry tailwinds, including rising insurance pricing, increasing corporate demand for risk advisory services, and growing complexity in employee benefits management.
Valuation metrics also paint an interesting contrast. Aon trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 18.6, while WTW trades at a lower forward multiple. Aon's premium valuation reflects its market leadership and consistent execution, whereas WTW's relative discount may appeal to value-oriented investors who believe the company's margin expansion and portfolio optimization will close the gap.
Based on observable market data, trend consistency, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely lean in favor of AON in the current market environment. Aon's larger scale, superior full-year adjusted operating margin, higher free cash flow generation, consistent organic revenue growth trajectory, and 15-year track record of consecutive dividend increases collectively signal a more established and resilient compounding model. While WTW offers a compelling turnaround narrative with accelerating margin expansion, strong Q4 profitability, and an attractive relative valuation, Aon's demonstrated ability to execute through varying market cycles — including the successful integration of NFP and rapid debt reduction — provides a more favorable balance of stability and growth. An AI-driven analysis would likely recognize WTW's improving momentum but ultimately assign a higher probability-weighted edge to Aon's broader competitive moat and consistent financial performance. This assessment is probabilistic in nature and reflects current observable trends, not a prediction of future outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AON’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AON’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AON (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.32%.
AON is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
WTW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| AON | WTW | AON / WTW | |
| Capitalization | 77.3B | 27.9B | 277% |
| EBITDA | 6.77B | 2.72B | 249% |
| Gain YTD | 2.989 | -9.566 | -31% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.85 | 17.33 | 115% |
| Revenue | 17.5B | 9.9B | 177% |
| Total Cash | 1.42B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 15.5B | 6.91B | 224% |
AON | WTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WTW's Valuation (78) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as AON (94) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to AON’s over the last 12 months.
AON's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as WTW (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AON’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
AON's SMR Rating (21) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as WTW (45) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AON’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
AON's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as WTW (48) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AON’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
AON's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as WTW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AON’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
| AON | WTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 51% | 5 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AON has been closely correlated with MRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AON jumps, then MRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AON | 100% | +1.66% | ||
| MRSH - AON | 81% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| AJG - AON | 77% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| WTW - AON | 75% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| BRO - AON | 73% Closely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| ERIE - AON | 48% Loosely correlated | +4.21% | ||
More | ||||