It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRYIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRYIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AIN (@Textiles) experienced а -2.69% price change this week, while TRYIF (@Textiles) price change was +6.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Textiles industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.11%.
AIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
The textiles industry includes companies that spin fiber and weave fabrics into raw products such as polyester filaments and staple yarns that are manufactured into finished products. Albany International Corp., Unifi, Inc. and Culp, Inc. are some of the major players in this business.
AIN | TRYIF | AIN / TRYIF | |
Capitalization | 2.83B | 9.04B | 31% |
EBITDA | 257M | 246B | 0% |
Gain YTD | -17.461 | 27.416 | -64% |
P/E Ratio | 25.54 | 17.54 | 146% |
Revenue | 1.15B | 2.48T | 0% |
Total Cash | 173M | 231B | 0% |
Total Debt | 515M | 1.03T | 0% |
AIN | TRYIF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRYIF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIN (89) in the Textiles industry. This means that TRYIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIN’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as TRYIF (100) in the null industry. This means that AIN’s stock grew similarly to TRYIF’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's SMR Rating (66) in the Textiles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRYIF (100) in the null industry. This means that AIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRYIF’s over the last 12 months.
TRYIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as AIN (59) in the Textiles industry. This means that TRYIF’s stock grew similarly to AIN’s over the last 12 months.
TRYIF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIN (76) in the Textiles industry. This means that TRYIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIN’s over the last 12 months.
AIN | TRYIF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago51% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago41% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago39% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago43% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago62% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago41% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago44% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VGSCX | 33.21 | N/A | N/A |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs C | |||
NEIAX | 60.23 | -0.24 | -0.40% |
Columbia Large Cap Index A | |||
JLGPX | 80.91 | -0.35 | -0.43% |
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R3 | |||
PXDIX | 9.16 | -0.06 | -0.65% |
Impax Global Sustainable Infras Instl | |||
IRCYX | 11.78 | -0.12 | -1.01% |
AB International Small Cap Adv |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TRYIF and TRYIY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRYIF and TRYIY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRYIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TRYIF | 100% | N/A | ||
TRYIY - TRYIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
LNZNF - TRYIF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
AIN - TRYIF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
SZHIF - TRYIF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CGGGF - TRYIF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |