Advertisement
AIN vs CULP
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIN is a Hold and CULP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCULP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CULP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CULP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CULP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AIN (@Textiles) experienced а +7.54% price change this week, while CULP (@Textiles) price change was -0.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Textiles industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
AIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
CULP is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Textiles (-1.18% weekly)The textiles industry includes companies that spin fiber and weave fabrics into raw products such as polyester filaments and staple yarns that are manufactured into finished products. Albany International Corp., Unifi, Inc. and Culp, Inc. are some of the major players in this business.
| AIN | CULP | AIN / CULP | |
| Capitalization | 1.77B | 43.4M | 4,081% |
| EBITDA | 57.6M | -3.06M | -1,885% |
| Gain YTD | 24.951 | -3.652 | -683% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.16 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.22B | 201M | 608% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 11.6M | - |
| Total Debt | 451M | 20.8M | 2,168% |
AIN | CULP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CULP's Valuation (24) in the Textiles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIN (86). This means that CULP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIN’s over the last 12 months.
CULP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as AIN (100). This means that CULP’s stock grew similarly to AIN’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's SMR Rating (92) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as CULP (96). This means that AIN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as CULP (58). This means that AIN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Textiles industry is significantly better than the same rating for CULP (99). This means that AIN’s stock grew significantly faster than CULP’s over the last 12 months.
| AIN | CULP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGJ | 23.39 | 0.21 | +0.92% |
| Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | |||
| FSCO | 5.30 | 0.04 | +0.76% |
| FS Credit Opportunities Corp | |||
| PFFV | 21.93 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | |||
| RMCA | 23.58 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| RSSY | 26.05 | -0.07 | -0.25% |
| Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | |||