Advertisement
AIOT vs CLRO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIOT is a Hold and CLRO is a Hold.
| AIOT | CLRO | AIOT / CLRO | |
| Capitalization | 402M | 13.3M | 3,023% |
| EBITDA | 79.9M | -4.15M | -1,927% |
| Gain YTD | -43.609 | -1.965 | 2,220% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 1.78 | - |
| Revenue | 450M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 32.8M | 75K | 43,733% |
| Total Debt | 296M | 500K | 59,200% |
AIOT | CLRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIOT's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLRO (64) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AIOT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLRO’s over the last 12 months.
AIOT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLRO (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AIOT’s stock grew similarly to CLRO’s over the last 12 months.
AIOT's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CLRO (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that AIOT’s stock grew similarly to CLRO’s over the last 12 months.
CLRO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as AIOT (63) in the null industry. This means that CLRO’s stock grew similarly to AIOT’s over the last 12 months.
CLRO's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for AIOT (100) in the null industry. This means that CLRO’s stock grew significantly faster than AIOT’s over the last 12 months.
| AIOT | CLRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 18 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIOT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while CLRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AIOT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CLRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIOT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLRO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AIOT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CLRO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
AIOT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while CLRO (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
AIOT is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.26% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
Advertisement
AIOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIOT has been loosely correlated with ZETA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AIOT jumps, then ZETA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIOT | 100% | +1.69% | ||
| ZETA - AIOT | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| AFRM - AIOT | 47% Loosely correlated | +5.07% | ||
| TLS - AIOT | 43% Loosely correlated | -15.60% | ||
| SOUN - AIOT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| KVYO - AIOT | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||
CLRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRO and AKTS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRO and AKTS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLRO | 100% | +2.46% | ||
| AKTS - CLRO | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
| SONM - CLRO | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| SYNX - CLRO | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| AIOT - CLRO | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
| VSAT - CLRO | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||