AIQ
Price
$66.53
Change
+$2.54 (+3.97%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
10.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CHAT
Price
$98.56
Change
+$5.42 (+5.82%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIQ vs CHAT

Header iconAIQ vs CHAT Comparison
Open Charts AIQ vs CHATBanner chart's image
AIQ vs CHAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) vs. Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT)

Key Takeaways

  • AIQ offers broader diversification with 84 holdings tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while CHAT is more concentrated with 42 actively managed holdings focused on generative AI.
  • Both ETFs exhibit heavy information technology sector exposure (AIQ: 75.7%; CHAT: approximately 70-75%), but AIQ includes more balanced allocations to communication services (9.6%) and consumer discretionary (8.5%).
  • AIQ's expense ratio of 0.68% is lower than CHAT's 0.75%, providing a cost advantage for long-term holders.
  • AIQ demonstrates higher liquidity and scale with $9.76 billion in assets under management (AUM), compared to CHAT's $1.63 billion.
  • Recent market cycles show CHAT delivering stronger relative returns in AI momentum phases due to active selection, while AIQ provides steadier performance with lower volatility.
  • Both funds feature significant international exposure through holdings like SK hynix and Samsung Electronics, mitigating U.S.-centric risks.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence (AI) landscape, investors seek targeted exposure to this transformative theme. The AIQ and CHAT ETFs represent compelling options within the AI ETF comparison space. AIQ provides passive tracking of companies involved in AI and big data, offering diversified sector exposure. CHAT, as an actively managed fund, concentrates on generative AI innovators, appealing to those pursuing higher-conviction bets. These ETFs compete indirectly, with AIQ suiting broad AI adoption plays and CHAT targeting cutting-edge generative models amid surging capital flows into AI infrastructure. Their structural differences highlight alternative paths to similar investor goals: capturing AI-driven growth in a volatile market environment.

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) Overview

The Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is a passively managed fund that seeks to replicate the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index before fees. Launched in May 2018, it invests at least 80% of assets in index securities, focusing on companies benefiting from AI technology development, utilization, and big data hardware analysis.

AIQ holds 84 securities, promoting diversification. Top holdings include SK hynix Inc. (6.31%), Micron Technology Inc. (MU, 5.08%), Intel Corp. (INTC, 5.07%), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. (4.75%), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD, 4.59%). The fund's expense ratio is 0.68%, with AUM at $9.76 billion supporting strong liquidity.

Sector allocations emphasize information technology (75.7%), followed by communication services (9.6%), consumer discretionary (8.5%), and industrials (5.5%). It features notable international exposure via South Korean and Taiwanese semiconductors. AIQ rebalances in line with the index methodology, maintaining a market-cap-weighted approach for structural stability.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed fund launched in May 2023, targeting equity securities of companies globally involved in generative AI and related technologies, including emerging markets. It holds 25-50 stocks, selected for thematic relevance without tracking a specific index.

CHAT comprises 42 holdings, enabling concentrated exposure. Top holdings are NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA, 6.85%), Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL, 6.49%), Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD, 5.78%), SK hynix Inc. (5.76%), and Micron Technology Inc. (MU, 5.63%). The expense ratio stands at 0.75%, with AUM of $1.63 billion.

Sector weights tilt heavily toward technology (around 70-75%), communication services (about 20%), and consumer cyclical (roughly 8%), based on holdings analysis. International names like Samsung Electronics and SoftBank Group add global diversification. As an active strategy, CHAT employs manager discretion for positioning, without fixed rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The AI sector thrives amid macroeconomic tailwinds, including hyperscaler investments in data centers and semiconductors. Capital flows into AI infrastructure have accelerated, driven by generative AI adoption across enterprise software, cloud computing, and hardware. Regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics and energy consumption poses risks, while geopolitical tensions impact supply chains for chips from Taiwan and South Korea.

Recent market cycles reflect sector rotation toward AI enablers, bolstered by earnings growth from leaders in GPUs and memory chips. Interest rate expectations influence growth stocks' valuations, with AI's productivity potential offsetting higher-for-longer rate pressures. Broader catalysts include AI integration in healthcare and industrials, though competition and commoditization in models present headwinds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, CHAT has outperformed AIQ, reflecting its active tilt toward high-momentum generative AI names like NVDA and GOOGL amid sector rallies. Year-to-date, CHAT's returns exceed AIQ's by a wide margin (e.g., CHAT ~46% vs. AIQ ~23%), tied to explosive growth in AI chip demand and model deployments.

Over broader cycles, AIQ's diversified passive structure delivers more consistent relative positioning, with lower volatility due to broader holdings and international balance. CHAT's concentration amplifies upside in AI bull phases but heightens drawdown risks during rotations away from megacaps. Both benefit from semiconductor earnings cycles and AI infrastructure spending, though AIQ's steadier profile suits risk-averse exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like AI. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors AIQ with moderate probability for most investors. Its superior diversification (84 holdings), lower expense ratio (0.68%), larger scale, and passive tracking provide structural strength and cost efficiency. While CHAT excels in trend consistency during AI momentum surges, AIQ's balanced risk exposure and relative stability position it better across market cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AIQ vs. CHAT commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIQ is a Hold and CHAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AIQ has more net assets: 10.5B vs. CHAT (2.01B). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than AIQ: CHAT (57.972) vs AIQ (25.836). AIQ was incepted earlier than CHAT: AIQ (8 years) vs CHAT (3 years). AIQ (0.68) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). CHAT has a higher turnover AIQ (15.52) vs AIQ (15.52).
AIQCHATAIQ / CHAT
Gain YTD25.83657.97245%
Net Assets10.5B2.01B522%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.7591%
Turnover15.5232.0049%
Yield0.141.728%
Fund Existence8 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIQCHAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XITK194.161.92
+1.00%
State Street® SPDR® FctSt Innvtv TechETF
ESLG27.670.21
+0.76%
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF
BIDD32.000.04
+0.13%
iShares International Dividend ActiveETF
BRRR17.93N/A
N/A
CoinShares Bitcoin ETF
IGLB49.98-0.05
-0.10%
iShares 10+ Year Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF

AIQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIQ has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIQ jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIQ
1D Price
Change %
AIQ100%
+0.08%
STM - AIQ
84%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
TSM - AIQ
71%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
MU - AIQ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
AMD - AIQ
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.73%
AVGO - AIQ
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
+0.77%
MU - CHAT
68%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
ARM - CHAT
66%
Closely correlated
+11.27%
NVDA - CHAT
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
AMD - CHAT
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.73%
AVGO - CHAT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More