AIQ
Price
$66.53
Change
+$2.54 (+3.97%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
10.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTEC
Price
$288.34
Change
+$9.42 (+3.38%)
Updated
Jun 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
20.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIQ vs FTEC

Header iconAIQ vs FTEC Comparison
Open Charts AIQ vs FTECBanner chart's image
AIQ vs FTEC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) vs. Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC)

Key Takeaways

  • AIQ offers targeted thematic exposure to artificial intelligence and big data companies globally, with 84 holdings and heavier weighting toward semiconductors, while FTEC provides broad U.S. information technology sector coverage across 284 holdings.
  • AIQ's expense ratio is 0.68%, significantly higher than FTEC's ultra-low 0.08%, making FTEC more cost-efficient for long-term holding.
  • Top holdings differ markedly: AIQ emphasizes international chipmakers like SK Hynix (6.31%) and Samsung (4.75%), whereas FTEC is dominated by U.S. giants such as NVIDIA (18.83%) and Apple (14.29%).
  • AIQ's sector allocation spans information technology (75.7%), communication services (9.6%), and consumer discretionary (8.5%), contrasting FTEC's near-100% information technology focus.
  • FTEC demonstrates superior diversification and liquidity, suited for core sector exposure, while AIQ carries higher thematic risk but potential for outsized gains in AI-driven cycles.
  • Both benefit from technology momentum, but FTEC's lower costs and broader base offer more stable relative positioning in varied market environments.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving technology landscape, investors face choices between broad sector exposure and targeted thematic strategies. The AIQ and FTEC ETFs represent complementary approaches within the information technology space. AIQ focuses on companies poised to benefit from artificial intelligence (AI) and big data advancements, offering global diversification. FTEC, meanwhile, tracks the comprehensive U.S. information technology sector, capturing established leaders across hardware, software, and services. Comparing these funds highlights trade-offs in cost, diversification, geographic reach, and growth potential, particularly amid surging AI adoption and sector rotation trends. This analysis equips investors to align exposure with risk tolerance and market outlook.

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) Overview

The Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is a passively managed thematic ETF that seeks to replicate the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. This index targets companies involved in AI development, utilization, and hardware for big data analysis, adopting an unconstrained approach across sectors and geographies. The fund holds 84 securities, with the top 10 comprising about 40% of assets. Key holdings include SK Hynix Inc. (6.31%), Micron Technology Inc. (MU, 5.08%), Intel Corp. (INTC, 5.07%), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. (4.75%), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD, 4.59%).

Sector allocations emphasize information technology at 75.7%, followed by communication services (9.6%), consumer discretionary (8.5%), and industrials (5.5%). Geographically diverse, AIQ allocates roughly 67% to the U.S., with notable exposure to South Korea, Taiwan, and others. The expense ratio stands at 0.68%, reflecting its specialized strategy. With assets under management (AUM) around $9.76 billion and a tight 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.02%, AIQ offers solid liquidity for a thematic fund.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is a passive ETF tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, which includes large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. equities classified in the information technology sector under Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It holds 284 securities for broad exposure, with the top 10 accounting for approximately 60% of assets. Leading positions are NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA, 18.83%), Apple Inc. (AAPL, 14.29%), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT, 9.91%), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO, 4.86%), and Micron Technology Inc. (MU, 2.64%).

Nearly 100% allocated to information technology, FTEC maintains pure sector focus, with sub-industries spanning semiconductors, software, and hardware. The expense ratio is a low 0.08%, supporting cost efficiency. AUM exceeds $19 billion, underpinned by high trading volume and strong liquidity. The index applies 25/50 diversification constraints to comply with regulatory investment company (RIC) limits, ensuring balanced positioning.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The information technology sector remains a cornerstone of global growth, fueled by AI proliferation, cloud computing expansion, and semiconductor demand. AI thematic ETFs like AIQ have seen robust capital inflows, with the theme capturing tens of billions in assets amid projections of the generative AI market expanding from $434 billion in 2026 to $2.5 trillion by 2031. Broader tech flows favor infrastructure plays, as capital expenditures (CapEx) for data centers and chips accelerate. Macro drivers include moderating interest rates, easing supply chain pressures, and geopolitical emphasis on domestic semiconductor production via CHIPS Act incentives. Risks encompass valuation stretches in mega-caps, regulatory scrutiny on AI ethics, and potential sector rotation toward energy or industrials if economic slowdowns emerge. Both ETFs are well-positioned amid these catalysts, with AIQ capturing niche innovation and FTEC anchoring established leaders.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have benefited from technology leadership, particularly AI-fueled rallies in semiconductors and software. FTEC's heavy concentration in top U.S. performers like NVDA and AAPL has driven strong relative returns over multi-year periods, often outpacing broader benchmarks amid earnings growth from cloud and hardware segments. AIQ, with its global AI tilt, has shown resilience in thematic rotations, gaining from international chipmakers during supply chain recoveries and AI hype cycles. Volatility profiles differ: FTEC's broader diversification tempers drawdowns, while AIQ's thematic focus amplifies swings tied to AI sentiment. Recent weeks reflect sector momentum from positive interest rate outlooks and CapEx announcements, positioning FTEC for stability and AIQ for upside in continued AI adoption.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using customizable criteria. It scans based on technical patterns like moving averages and RSI (Relative Strength Index, a momentum oscillator measuring speed and change of price movements), fundamentals such as P/E ratios and revenue growth, trends including sector momentum, volatility metrics like beta, and proprietary AI-driven signals for pattern recognition and predictive insights. Users can target specific industries, market capitalizations, price patterns, breakout candidates, or performance thresholds to uncover trade ideas and market opportunities efficiently. Beyond manual screening, the AI Screener identifies hidden gems in real-time, saving hours of analysis. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FTEC with moderate conviction (65-75% probability edge). Its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), extensive diversification (284 holdings), dominant U.S. sector momentum, and consistent trend alignment outweigh AIQ's thematic appeal in the current environment. While AIQ excels in targeted AI exposure, FTEC's structural advantages and lower risk profile position it better for sustained outperformance across market cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AIQ vs. FTEC commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIQ is a Hold and FTEC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 20.4B vs. AIQ (10.5B). AIQ has a higher annual dividend yield than FTEC: AIQ (25.836) vs FTEC (24.274). AIQ was incepted earlier than FTEC: AIQ (8 years) vs FTEC (13 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than AIQ (0.68). AIQ has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
AIQFTECAIQ / FTEC
Gain YTD25.83624.274106%
Net Assets10.5B20.4B51%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.08810%
Turnover15.529.00172%
Yield0.140.3343%
Fund Existence8 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIQFTEC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBOS27.910.16
+0.57%
Neuberger Option Strategy ETF
PFDE27.490.13
+0.49%
Pathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETF
TDEC26.090.03
+0.10%
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Dec
BSCQ19.56-0.01
-0.03%
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corp Bd ETF
EEA10.62-0.12
-1.12%
European Equity Fund (The)

AIQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIQ has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIQ jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIQ
1D Price
Change %
AIQ100%
+0.08%
STM - AIQ
84%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
TSM - AIQ
71%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
MU - AIQ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
AMD - AIQ
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.73%
AVGO - AIQ
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More

FTEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTEC
1D Price
Change %
FTEC100%
+0.61%
NVDA - FTEC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
LRCX - FTEC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
AVGO - FTEC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
CEVA - FTEC
69%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
KLAC - FTEC
67%
Closely correlated
+5.55%
More