Advertisement
ALB vs HUN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs. Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both ALB and HUN operate in the basic materials sector but differ in focus: ALB emphasizes lithium production for electric vehicles (EVs), while HUN offers diversified chemicals including polyurethanes.
- HUN shows stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at approximately 47%, outperforming ALB's 37% gain amid recent market recovery.
- ALB exhibits higher volatility with a beta of 1.37 and larger market capitalization of $22.9 billion, compared to HUN's $2.5 billion and higher dividend yield of 3.5%.
- Lithium price stabilization has supported ALB's recent momentum, while HUN benefits from operational expansions and pricing strength in chemicals.
- Both stocks trade at negative earnings multiples due to recent losses, highlighting cyclical risks in the sector.
- Tickeron's analysis positions HUN as a relatively stronger long-term buy based on valuation and stability.
Introduction
This comparison examines ALB and HUN, two specialty chemicals firms navigating industrial cycles and energy transition trends. Investors seeking exposure to materials with growth potential from EVs and steady dividends may find value here. Traders monitoring relative performance in a recovering market can assess momentum shifts, volatility trade-offs, and sector catalysts. With both stocks rebounding YTD amid broader economic optimism, this analysis highlights key contrasts in business models, recent trajectories, and market positioning.
ALB Overview and Recent Performance
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is a leading producer of lithium, a critical battery material for EVs and energy storage, alongside bromine and catalysts. In recent market activity, ALB shares have risen about 37% YTD, reflecting lithium price stabilization after earlier lows around $9,000-$10,000 per metric ton, now in the $20,000-$24,000 range. The stock experienced volatility, including a 16% single-session surge amid rebound momentum, though it dipped recently against broader gains. Sentiment has improved on capacity expansions and projected demand growth from EVs, with earnings anticipated soon. Trading near $194 with a 52-week range of $54-$216, ALB remains sensitive to commodity cycles but shows positioning for lithium's structural uptrend.
HUN Overview and Recent Performance
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) manufactures diversified chemicals, including polyurethanes, performance products, and advanced materials for industries like construction and automotive. Recent weeks have seen HUN advance roughly 47% YTD, outperforming peers on operational resilience. Q1 results highlighted pricing strength and demand carryover into Q2, alongside expansions like the Hungary facility boosting capacity. Shares hover around $14.60, within a 52-week band of $7.30-$15.90, with a compelling 3.5% dividend yield supporting income focus. Performance reflects steady execution amid chemical market normalization, though cyclical pressures persist.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers including stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, swing trading, momentum, and multi-agent signals with risk controls such as take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 163%, win rates reaching 88%, and profit factors as high as 11.7, though max drawdowns vary significantly based on capital and timeframe (e.g., 15min to 49 days). Timeframes range from intraday to multi-day, covering sectors like semiconductors and energy. Traders can explore these high-conviction options tailored to current conditions for potential edge in volatile markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ALB and HUN share sector exposure but diverge in models: ALB's lithium-centric growth ties to EV adoption, contrasting HUN's broader chemicals portfolio for stability. Growth drivers favor ALB via energy storage demand, while HUN leverages pricing and expansions. Recent momentum edges HUN YTD, but ALB shows sharper upside bursts. Risks include lithium volatility for ALB (higher beta) versus HUN's earnings pressure; both face negative EPS. Sentiment tilts positive for ALB on commodity rebound, HUN on dividends and operations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors HUN over ALB in the near term, citing superior relative YTD gains, dividend stability, and long-term buy signals amid consistent operational trends. While ALB offers lithium catalysts, HUN's lower volatility and valuation position it probabilistically stronger for balanced portfolios in current conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a StrongBuy and HUN is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ALB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -17.77% price change this week, while HUN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -7.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +117.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALB is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
HUN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.24% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-1.79% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| ALB | HUN | ALB / HUN | |
| Capitalization | 19.9B | 2.34B | 852% |
| EBITDA | 568M | 168M | 338% |
| Gain YTD | 19.781 | 34.117 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.94 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.5B | 5.78B | 95% |
| Total Cash | 1.09B | 369M | 295% |
| Total Debt | 1.88B | 2.49B | 76% |
ALB | HUN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUN's Valuation (12) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (73) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's SMR Rating (92) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (93) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (42) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as ALB (3) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.
| ALB | HUN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 15 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NUV | 9.04 | 0.04 | +0.44% |
| Nuveen Municipal Value Fund | |||
| XOMZ | 16.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Direxion Daily Xom Bear 1X Shares | |||
| UXJL | 35.96 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | |||
| MMD | 14.97 | -0.09 | -0.60% |
| NYLI MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund | |||
| IWMW | 37.41 | -0.33 | -0.89% |
| iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF | |||
ALB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALB has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALB jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
HUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.