It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ALC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while COO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +8.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.69%.
ALC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
COO is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| ALC | COO | ALC / COO | |
| Capitalization | 38.6B | 15.5B | 249% |
| EBITDA | 2.74B | 1.09B | 252% |
| Gain YTD | -6.161 | -14.924 | 41% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.93 | 38.34 | 99% |
| Revenue | 10B | 4.05B | 247% |
| Total Cash | 1.41B | 125M | 1,126% |
| Total Debt | 5.25B | 2.48B | 212% |
ALC | COO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALC's Valuation (76) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as COO (77) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ALC’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.
ALC's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ALC’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.
ALC's SMR Rating (80) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as COO (80) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ALC’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.
COO's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ALC (60) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that COO’s stock grew similarly to ALC’s over the last 12 months.
ALC's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (82) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ALC’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.
| ALC | COO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALC has been loosely correlated with SYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALC jumps, then SYK could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.