Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ALCBX vs RLBGX
ALCBX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts ALCBX vs RLBGX
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity C
Price$13.11
Change-$0.05 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.88M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$38.74
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
ALCBX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCBX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCBX is a Hold and RLBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. ALCBX (12.9M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than ALCBX: RLBGX (2.01) vs ALCBX (1.05). ALCBX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: ALCBX (5 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). ALCBX (3.33) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). ALCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALCBX: RLBGX (250) vs ALCBX (2500). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. ALCBX (-0.51). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.06 vs. ALCBX (30.41).
| ALCBX | RLBGX | ALCBX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.25 | 740% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.33 | 0.25 | 1,332% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.757 | 14.068 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9M | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 2.01 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.51 | 9.20 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.96 | 41.98 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | 40.06 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.39 | 74.32 | 22% |