It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLOV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALHC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLOV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ALHC (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -17.02% price change this week, while CLOV (@Managed Health Care) price change was -9.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.30%.
ALHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
CLOV is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| ALHC | CLOV | ALHC / CLOV | |
| Capitalization | 4.22B | 2.41B | 175% |
| EBITDA | 66.4M | -55.21M | -120% |
| Gain YTD | 3.190 | 94.468 | 3% |
| P/E Ratio | 203.90 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.26B | 2.21B | 193% |
| Total Cash | 726M | 204M | 356% |
| Total Debt | 330M | 3.67M | 9,002% |
CLOV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ALHC | CLOV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 19 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 84% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DSTL | 62.60 | 0.60 | +0.97% |
| Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF | |||
| VLLU | 26.53 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| INTW | 30.37 | N/A | N/A |
| GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | |||
| GTIP | 48.08 | -0.08 | -0.18% |
| Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF | |||
| BBCB | 44.60 | -0.18 | -0.39% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that ALHC and CLOV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALHC and CLOV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALHC | 100% | +2.77% | ||
| CLOV - ALHC | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.93% | ||
| CNC - ALHC | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| PGNY - ALHC | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.34% | ||
| MOH - ALHC | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
| OSCR - ALHC | 19% Poorly correlated | +3.47% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLOV and OSCR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLOV and OSCR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOV | 100% | +2.93% | ||
| OSCR - CLOV | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.47% | ||
| ALHC - CLOV | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
| PGNY - CLOV | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.34% | ||
| CNC - CLOV | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| MOH - CLOV | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.10% | ||
More | ||||