ALSN
Price
$98.72
Change
+$1.49 (+1.53%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.23B
76 days until earnings call
GTX
Price
$11.36
Change
+$0.04 (+0.35%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ALSN vs GTX

Header iconALSN vs GTX Comparison
Open Charts ALSN vs GTXBanner chart's image
Allison Transmission Holdings
Price$98.72
Change+$1.49 (+1.53%)
Volume$486.19K
Capitalization7.23B
Garrett Motion
Price$11.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.35%)
Volume$2.15M
Capitalization2.37B
ALSN vs GTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALSN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALSN vs. GTX commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSN is a Buy and GTX is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ALSN: $98.72 vs. GTX: $11.36)
Brand notoriety: ALSN and GTX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSN: 56% vs. GTX: 122%
Market capitalization -- ALSN: $7.23B vs. GTX: $2.37B
ALSN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $7.23B. GTX’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGTX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ALSN and GTX are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GTX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the short-term than ALSN.

Price Growth

ALSN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +5.71% price change this week, while GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +11.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALSN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

GTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.20% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSN($7.23B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.37B). ALSN has higher P/E ratio than GTX: ALSN (10.92) vs GTX (10.19). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 26.613 vs. ALSN (-8.400). ALSN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. GTX (600M). GTX has higher revenues than ALSN: GTX (3.89B) vs ALSN (2.98B).
ALSNGTXALSN / GTX
Capitalization7.23B2.37B305%
EBITDA1.06B600M176%
Gain YTD-8.40026.613-32%
P/E Ratio10.9210.19107%
Revenue2.98B3.89B77%
Total CashN/A259M-
Total DebtN/A1.69B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSN vs GTX: Fundamental Ratings
ALSN
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1330
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1836
SMR RATING
1..100
19100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
345
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTX's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALSN (76) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALSN’s over the last 12 months.

ALSN's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as GTX (36) in the null industry. This means that ALSN’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

ALSN's SMR Rating (19) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that ALSN’s stock grew significantly faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ALSN (50) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to ALSN’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ALSN (34) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to ALSN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSNGTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALSN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFMLX36.300.20
+0.55%
DF Dent Midcap Growth Institutional Plus
FNWFX81.520.18
+0.22%
American Funds New World F3
CHTVX20.76N/A
N/A
Invesco Charter R5
SPSAX17.69N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq A
NRINX19.05N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value R6

ALSN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALSN has been loosely correlated with LKQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALSN jumps, then LKQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSN
1D Price
Change %
ALSN100%
+1.53%
LKQ - ALSN
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
PHIN - ALSN
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
THRM - ALSN
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
MLR - ALSN
54%
Loosely correlated
+6.61%
BWA - ALSN
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
+0.35%
BWA - GTX
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
LKQ - GTX
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
ALV - GTX
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
LEA - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.67%
MGA - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
More