ALSN
Price
$117.35
Change
+$1.83 (+1.58%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
9.73B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$85.16
Change
+$3.35 (+4.09%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALSN vs PHIN

Header iconALSN vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts ALSN vs PHINBanner chart's image
ALSN vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) vs. PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ALSN boasts a larger market capitalization (market capitalization, or market cap, is the total value of a company's outstanding shares) of approximately $11.2 billion compared to PHIN's $2.7 billion, reflecting greater scale in the auto parts sector.
  • Year-to-date (YTD) performance favors ALSN at +37.6%, outperforming PHIN's +15.6%, driven by steady gains in recent market activity.
  • ALSN exhibits superior profitability with a 20.7% profit margin and 35.4% return on equity (ROE, a measure of how effectively a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits), versus PHIN's 3.7% margin and 8.2% ROE.
  • Recent earnings for PHIN beat estimates in Q1 2026, boosting sentiment, while ALSN maintains consistent momentum near its 52-week high.
  • Trailing price-to-earnings (P/E, a valuation ratio comparing stock price to earnings per share) ratios are similar at 18.3 for ALSN and 20.2 for PHIN, but PHIN's forward P/E of 11.4 suggests potential undervaluation.
  • Both stocks operate in auto parts but differ in focus: ALSN on transmissions for commercial vehicles, PHIN on fuel systems and aftermarket parts.

Introduction

In the competitive auto parts sector within consumer cyclical stocks, ALSN and PHIN offer distinct profiles for investors and traders seeking exposure to vehicle propulsion and fuel systems. This comparison analyzes their recent performance, financial health, and market positioning amid evolving industry dynamics like electrification and defense demand. Traders focused on momentum and value plays, or long-term investors eyeing sector stability, will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and AI-driven perspectives on stock comparison and market trends.

ALSN Overview and Recent Performance

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) designs and manufactures fully automatic transmissions for medium- and heavy-duty commercial vehicles, military applications, and hybrid propulsion systems. With trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $3.01 billion and net income of $623 million, the company maintains robust profitability. In recent weeks, ALSN stock has shown strong upward momentum, trading near its 52-week high of $137.62 after climbing approximately 19% over the past month and 38% YTD. This performance reflects positive sentiment from steady demand in commercial and defense sectors, supported by high operating margins around 22% and analyst price targets averaging $133. Factors influencing recent activity include consistent cash flow generation and a favorable PEG ratio (price/earnings-to-growth) of 0.81, signaling growth at a reasonable valuation.

PHIN Overview and Recent Performance

PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) develops integrated components and systems, primarily fuel systems and aftermarket parts for engines across passenger and commercial vehicles. TTM revenue stands at $3.48 billion with net income of $130 million, reflecting solid scale but thinner margins. Recent market activity has been mixed for PHIN, with shares up 16% over the past month and 16% YTD, following a strong one-year gain of 83%. Key catalysts include Q1 2026 results that topped estimates—revenue of $878 million and earnings of $50 million—along with strategic wins in alternative fuels and diversification. Sentiment has improved post-earnings, though volatility persists near the 52-week high of $81.11, influenced by industry shifts and buyback announcements.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored to current market conditions across sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and volatility plays. These bots exhibit impressive stats, including annualized returns from +24% to +164%, win rates ranging 51% to 88%, and timeframes such as 5-minute, 15-minute, or 60-minute trades. Examples include a semiconductor bot trading LRCX and AMAT with +98% returns and 63% win rate, or a volatility bot on USAR with +164% returns and 75% win rate. Each bot employs unique strategies, from pattern recognition to momentum, targeting specific ticker sets. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to align with prevailing trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both ALSN and PHIN thrive in auto parts amid sector recovery, but diverge in business models: ALSN specializes in high-margin transmissions for durable commercial and defense uses, while PHIN emphasizes fuel delivery and aftermarket, pursuing growth in electrification and alternative fuels. Growth drivers contrast with ALSN's defense backlog versus PHIN's end-market diversification. Recent momentum tilts to ALSN for consistency, though PHIN shows upside post-earnings. Risk factors include ALSN's higher debt-to-equity (155% vs. 64%) amid cyclical exposure, balanced by superior ROE. Market sentiment favors ALSN for stability, while PHIN appeals for value via lower forward multiples and revenue scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward ALSN due to its trend consistency, higher profitability margins, and stronger relative YTD positioning in recent weeks. Factors like elevated ROE and cash flow stability provide a probabilistic edge over PHIN's earnings momentum, though PHIN could gain if diversification catalysts materialize.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ALSN vs. PHIN commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALSN is a StrongBuy and PHIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ALSN: $117.35 vs. PHIN: $85.16)
Brand notoriety: ALSN and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALSN: 75% vs. PHIN: 208%
Market capitalization -- ALSN: $9.73B vs. PHIN: $3.15B
ALSN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.73B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $75.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALSN’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALSN’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALSN is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALSN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALSN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ALSN and PHIN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ALSN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +7.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALSN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALSN($9.73B) has a higher market cap than PHIN($3.15B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than ALSN: PHIN (23.85) vs ALSN (18.25). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 36.942 vs. ALSN (20.464). ALSN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. PHIN (447M). PHIN has less debt than ALSN: PHIN (1.04B) vs ALSN (4.27B). ALSN (3.65B) and PHIN (3.57B) have equivalent revenues.
ALSNPHINALSN / PHIN
Capitalization9.73B3.15B309%
EBITDA1.01B447M226%
Gain YTD20.46436.94255%
P/E Ratio18.2523.8577%
Revenue3.65B3.57B102%
Total Cash311MN/A-
Total Debt4.27B1.04B411%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALSN: Fundamental Ratings
ALSN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALSNPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALSN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALIT0.760.08
+11.70%
Alight
VERX12.280.17
+1.40%
Vertex
SNEX130.690.95
+0.73%
Stonex Group Inc
XRPNU10.77N/A
N/A
Armada Acquisition Corp. II
PN4.17-0.13
-3.02%
Skycorp Solar Group Limited

ALSN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALSN has been loosely correlated with ATMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALSN jumps, then ATMU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALSN
1D Price
Change %
ALSN100%
+1.58%
ATMU - ALSN
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
PHIN - ALSN
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
ALV - ALSN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
PLOW - ALSN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
MGA - ALSN
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More