ALV
Price
$100.62
Change
+$0.08 (+0.08%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
9.81B
56 days until earnings call
CTTAY
Price
$8.61
Change
-$0.04 (-0.46%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs CTTAY

Header iconALV vs CTTAY Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs CTTAYBanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$100.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.08%)
Volume$444.47K
Capitalization9.81B
Continental AG
Price$8.61
Change-$0.04 (-0.46%)
Volume$73.2K
Capitalization16.01B
ALV vs CTTAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. CTTAY commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Buy and CTTAY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ALV: $100.54 vs. CTTAY: $8.65)
Brand notoriety: ALV and CTTAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 59% vs. CTTAY: 13%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.81B vs. CTTAY: $16.01B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.81B. CTTAY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $16.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCTTAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTTAY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the short-term than CTTAY.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.29% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAY($16B) has a higher market cap than ALV($9.81B). CTTAY has higher P/E ratio than ALV: CTTAY (69.93) vs ALV (21.08). CTTAY YTD gains are higher at: 40.316 vs. ALV (8.807). CTTAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.19B vs. ALV (1.08B). CTTAY has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. ALV (498M). ALV has less debt than CTTAY: ALV (2.04B) vs CTTAY (8.01B). CTTAY has higher revenues than ALV: CTTAY (40.4B) vs ALV (10.5B).
ALVCTTAYALV / CTTAY
Capitalization9.81B16B61%
EBITDA1.08B4.19B26%
Gain YTD8.80740.31622%
P/E Ratio21.0869.9330%
Revenue10.5B40.4B26%
Total Cash498M2.38B21%
Total Debt2.04B8.01B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs CTTAY: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
CTTAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2725
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4269
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9176
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTAY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as ALV (23) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAY (69) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAY (100) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ALV (47) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ALV (91) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVCTTAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OVM20.76N/A
N/A
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
AGOX28.00N/A
N/A
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
LOWV71.92N/A
N/A
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
IWV331.23-0.09
-0.03%
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
ILCV80.04-0.24
-0.30%
iShares Morningstar Value ETF

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
+0.08%
DAN - ALV
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
BWA - ALV
74%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
LEA - ALV
73%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
MGA - ALV
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
ADNT - ALV
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
-0.46%
VLEEY - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
CTTAF - CTTAY
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
MGDDY - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
ALV - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
LEA - CTTAY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
More