ALV
Price
$124.93
Change
-$0.09 (-0.07%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.6B
29 days until earnings call
GTX
Price
$13.14
Change
+$0.12 (+0.92%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.62B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs GTX

Header iconALV vs GTX Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs GTXBanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$124.93
Change-$0.09 (-0.07%)
Volume$586.99K
Capitalization9.6B
Garrett Motion
Price$13.14
Change+$0.12 (+0.92%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization2.62B
ALV vs GTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. GTX commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Hold and GTX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ALV: $124.93 vs. GTX: $13.14)
Brand notoriety: ALV and GTX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 92% vs. GTX: 68%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.6B vs. GTX: $2.62B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.6B. GTX’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $89.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGTX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GTX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than GTX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GTX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ALV and GTX are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

GTX is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.38% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALV($9.6B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.63B). ALV has higher P/E ratio than GTX: ALV (13.70) vs GTX (9.25). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 47.913 vs. ALV (36.016). ALV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. GTX (574M). ALV (237M) and GTX (232M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GTX has less debt than ALV: GTX (1.52B) vs ALV (2.22B). ALV has higher revenues than GTX: ALV (10.5B) vs GTX (3.46B).
ALVGTXALV / GTX
Capitalization9.6B2.63B366%
EBITDA1.47B574M256%
Gain YTD36.01647.91375%
P/E Ratio13.709.25148%
Revenue10.5B3.46B303%
Total Cash237M232M102%
Total Debt2.22B1.52B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs GTX: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8375
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3638
SMR RATING
1..100
32100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
407
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALV's Valuation (30) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (30) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (38) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (32) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew significantly faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ALV (43) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALV (40) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVGTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIBRX31.86N/A
N/A
Thornburg Investment Income Builder R3
VMMSX27.35N/A
N/A
Vanguard Emerg Mkts Sel Stk Inv
JAMFX7.77N/A
N/A
Jacob Internet Inv
HFYRX13.30N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
PISDX16.29-0.07
-0.43%
Columbia Pyrford International Stock A

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
+0.88%
BWA - GTX
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
LEA - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
ALV - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
APTV - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
PHIN - GTX
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More