AMAT
Price
$547.87
Change
-$14.93 (-2.65%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
446.84B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$929.71
Change
-$60.50 (-6.11%)
Updated
Jul 24, 02:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.12T
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAT vs MU

AMAT vs MU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Micron Technology (MU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Applied Materials operates as the world's largest semiconductor wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) supplier, while Micron Technology is the only U.S.-based manufacturer of DRAM, NAND, and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips.
  • Both companies are deeply intertwined with the AI infrastructure build-out, but they occupy different positions in the semiconductor value chain — AMAT provides the "picks and shovels," while MU produces the memory itself.
  • Over the trailing twelve months, Micron has delivered dramatically higher share price appreciation, fueled by an unprecedented memory supercycle driven by AI data center demand.
  • Applied Materials offers a more diversified, lower-cyclicality profile with a nine-year track record of consecutive dividend increases, appealing to investors seeking stability alongside growth.
  • Valuation profiles diverge sharply: Micron trades at a notably lower forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple, reflecting its historical cyclicality, while AMAT commands a higher multiple for its steadier earnings stream.
  • The two companies recently formalized a strategic partnership to accelerate next-generation DRAM and HBM development, underscoring their complementary roles in the AI ecosystem.

Introduction

Comparing AMAT and MU offers a window into two distinct yet interconnected segments of the semiconductor industry — equipment manufacturing and memory chip production. Applied Materials supplies the sophisticated machinery that fabricates chips; Micron Technology manufactures the memory chips that power data centers, smartphones, and increasingly, artificial intelligence workloads. For investors navigating the AI-driven semiconductor boom, understanding how these two business models differ in growth trajectory, cyclicality, and market positioning is essential. This comparison is particularly relevant for those deciding between a diversified equipment play and a concentrated bet on the memory supercycle.

AMAT Overview and Recent Performance

AMAT, or Applied Materials, Inc., is the global leader in semiconductor wafer fabrication equipment, providing critical tools for deposition, etching, metrology, inspection, and advanced packaging. Headquartered in Santa Clara, California, the company serves virtually every major chip manufacturer, including TSMC, Intel, and Samsung. In its most recent fiscal periods, Applied Materials has demonstrated solid growth — fiscal 2025 marked the company's sixth consecutive year of revenue expansion, with annual sales reaching approximately $28.4 billion. The company's Q2 FY2026 results delivered record revenue of $7.91 billion, reflecting an 11% year-over-year increase, with non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) rising 20% to $2.86. Driving this performance is accelerating demand for equipment used in leading-edge foundry-logic, DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory), and advanced packaging — all critical AI enablers. However, AMAT has navigated headwinds from U.S. export controls affecting its China business, which has gradually declined as a percentage of total revenue. The company has also undertaken cost-efficiency measures, including a workforce reduction of roughly 4%, while simultaneously investing in a $5 billion EPIC Center in Silicon Valley to accelerate R&D (research and development).

MU Overview and Recent Performance

MU, or Micron Technology, Inc., is the only U.S.-based manufacturer of memory and storage semiconductors, producing DRAM, NAND flash, and HBM (high-bandwidth memory) — the advanced memory stacks essential for AI servers. Headquartered in Boise, Idaho, Micron has experienced an extraordinary transformation over the past year. In fiscal 2025, the company reported record revenue of $37.4 billion, up 49% year-over-year, with non-GAAP EPS surging over 500% to $8.29. The momentum accelerated further in Q1 FY2026, when Micron posted revenue of $13.64 billion — a 57% increase — and non-GAAP EPS of $4.78, crushing consensus estimates. Gross margins expanded to 56.8%, a level once unthinkable for a memory manufacturer. The primary catalyst has been the AI-driven memory supercycle: Micron's entire HBM production capacity is sold out through the end of 2026, with pricing power shifting decisively in the company's favor. The company has also announced a phased exit from its consumer-facing Crucial brand to redirect wafer capacity toward higher-margin data center products. On the policy front, Micron has secured CHIPS Act funding of up to $6.1 billion to expand domestic manufacturing in Idaho and New York.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating stocks like AMAT and MU, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only the most effective and timely strategies earn placement in this dedicated section. These bots employ a range of trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend-following — and each comes with distinct performance metrics, statistical profiles, and ticker-specific specializations. Some bots have demonstrated win rates exceeding 70%, while others focus on maximizing risk-adjusted returns through sophisticated stop-loss mechanisms and position-sizing algorithms. Whether you are monitoring semiconductor equipment names or memory chip plays, exploring the Trending AI Robots section can help identify which automated strategies are currently aligned with evolving market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental contrast between AMAT and MU lies in their business models. Applied Materials generates revenue by selling capital equipment to chipmakers — a model that benefits from secular growth in semiconductor complexity but remains tied to customers' capital expenditure (CapEx) cycles. Micron, by contrast, sells memory chips directly into end markets, making it far more sensitive to commodity pricing dynamics and supply-demand imbalances. This structural difference explains why MU has delivered explosive earnings growth during the current AI memory crunch, while AMAT's revenue growth has been more measured — in the mid-single-digit to low-double-digit range — but comparatively steadier across cycles.

On the growth dimension, Micron is the clear standout. Its revenue expanded 49% in fiscal 2025, and the Q1 FY2026 print showed 57% year-over-year growth, dwarfing AMAT's 11% increase in its most recent quarter. Gross margin trends also favor MU, which expanded to 56.8% compared to AMAT's approximately 50%. However, this growth advantage comes with significantly higher volatility. Memory markets have historically experienced boom-and-bust cycles, and while the AI supercycle may extend the current upswing, Micron's earnings remain structurally more variable than Applied Materials' equipment and services revenue.

Risk profiles diverge meaningfully. AMAT faces geopolitical risk through export control restrictions on China-bound equipment, which have already reduced the country's contribution to roughly 26% of revenue and continue to decline. Micron faces concentration risk — HBM now dominates its growth narrative — and any softening in hyperscaler CapEx or competitive pressure from SK Hynix and Samsung could disproportionately impact results. On the income front, AMAT's nine-year streak of dividend increases and a quarterly payout of $0.53 per share offer a clear advantage over MU's more modest $0.15 quarterly dividend.

Valuation tells a compelling story: Micron's forward P/E ratio near 6x reflects the market's lingering skepticism about memory cyclicality despite record results, while AMAT's forward P/E near 38x reflects confidence in its durable earnings power and diversified exposure. Both stocks have delivered extraordinary returns — MU has risen over 200% in the past year, and AMAT has more than doubled — but the sources of those returns differ: explosive earnings growth for Micron versus steady multiple expansion and consistent execution for Applied Materials.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and sector positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely find a nuanced preference between these two semiconductor leaders. Micron Technology currently exhibits stronger near-term momentum — revenue growth exceeding 50%, gross margins above 55%, and a structural supply shortage that extends pricing power well into 2026. Its HBM sold-out status through year-end provides unusual revenue visibility for a memory name. Applied Materials, however, demonstrates superior trend consistency, a more diversified revenue base spanning logic, DRAM, NAND, and advanced packaging, and a proven ability to compound shareholder returns across multiple cycles. An AI-driven assessment would probably favor MU for momentum-oriented strategies in the current environment given the magnitude and durability of the AI memory tailwind, while recognizing that AMAT presents a more balanced risk-reward profile for investors prioritizing capital preservation alongside growth. Both companies benefit from secular AI infrastructure trends; the choice between them ultimately depends on an investor's tolerance for cyclicality and their conviction in the longevity of the memory supercycle.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AMAT vs. MU commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAT is a Hold and MU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (AMAT: $562.80 vs. MU: $990.21)
Brand notoriety: AMAT and MU are both notable
AMAT represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while MU is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAT: 37% vs. MU: 51%
Market capitalization -- AMAT: $446.84B vs. MU: $1.12T
AMAT [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $446.84B. MU’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $1.12T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $696.23B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $69.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $189.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than AMAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMAT is a better buy in the short-term than MU.

Price Growth

AMAT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +16.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.27%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Sep 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+1.58% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-0.83% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($1.12T) has a higher market cap than AMAT($447B). AMAT has higher P/E ratio than MU: AMAT (52.94) vs MU (22.38). MU YTD gains are higher at: 247.142 vs. AMAT (119.543). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68.3B vs. AMAT (11.1B). MU has more cash in the bank: 26B vs. AMAT (8.24B). MU has less debt than AMAT: MU (6.38B) vs AMAT (7.27B). MU has higher revenues than AMAT: MU (90.3B) vs AMAT (29B).
AMATMUAMAT / MU
Capitalization447B1.12T40%
EBITDA11.1B68.3B16%
Gain YTD119.543247.14248%
P/E Ratio52.9422.38237%
Revenue29B90.3B32%
Total Cash8.24B26B32%
Total Debt7.27B6.38B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAT vs MU: Fundamental Ratings
AMAT
MU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6462
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2016
SMR RATING
1..100
2417
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
733
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (57) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (78) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (24) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.

AMAT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MU (33) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMATMU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSPCX12.61N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
MNNAX66.90N/A
N/A
Victory Multi-Cap A
WDSAX18.90N/A
N/A
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap A
PETGX12.09N/A
N/A
Gabelli Pet Parents'™ A
ACCLX16.14-0.01
-0.06%
American Century Mid Cap Value C

AMAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAT has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAT jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAT
1D Price
Change %
AMAT100%
+1.60%
LRCX - AMAT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
KLAC - AMAT
87%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
NVMI - AMAT
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
ASML - AMAT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
QCOM - AMAT
75%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
More