LRCX
Price
$312.99
Change
-$6.80 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jul 24, 12:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
399.91B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$990.21
Change
+$30.73 (+3.20%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.12T
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRCX vs MU

LRCX vs MU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lam Research (LRCX) vs. Micron Technology (MU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Lam Research (LRCX) and Micron Technology (MU) both operate in the semiconductor sector but occupy fundamentally different positions — LRCX manufactures the equipment that builds chips, while MU produces the memory chips themselves.
  • Both stocks have delivered exceptional year-to-date and trailing one-year returns, fueled by surging AI-driven demand for advanced memory and logic semiconductors.
  • MU carries a significantly lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio near 19, compared with LRCX's trailing P/E of roughly 59, reflecting different business models and cyclical exposures.
  • LRCX benefits from a "picks-and-shovels" revenue model with equipment sales to multiple chipmakers, while MU's earnings are more directly linked to memory chip pricing cycles.
  • Both stocks have experienced notable pullbacks in recent weeks, partly driven by broader semiconductor sector weakness tied to capital expenditure (capex) recalibrations and global trade uncertainties.
  • Wall Street analyst sentiment remains broadly constructive on both names, with LRCX carrying a consensus "Moderate Buy" rating and MU benefiting from upward earnings estimate revisions in recent months.

Introduction

Investors navigating the semiconductor landscape in 2026 are increasingly confronted with a critical question: should capital flow toward the equipment makers that enable chip production, or toward the memory manufacturers whose products power everything from data centers to smartphones? This comparison between LRCX (Lam Research) and MU (Micron Technology) examines two high-profile beneficiaries of the artificial intelligence boom, each with a distinct risk-reward profile. Whether you are a growth-focused trader monitoring relative momentum or a long-term investor weighing structural exposure to the AI theme, understanding how these two stocks diverge — and where they overlap — can offer valuable perspective on portfolio positioning within the semiconductor ecosystem.

LRCX Overview and Recent Performance

LRCX, or Lam Research Corporation, is a leading global supplier of wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) used in semiconductor manufacturing. Headquartered in Fremont, California, the company specializes in etch, deposition, and wafer-cleaning technologies that are critical for producing advanced logic and memory chips. Lam's equipment is essential for manufacturing cutting-edge processors, high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and 3D NAND — all of which have seen surging demand amid the AI infrastructure buildout. The company recently reported fiscal third-quarter 2026 revenue of $5.84 billion, up 23.8% year over year, while non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) reached a record $1.47. In recent weeks, the stock has pulled back from its 52-week high of $438.50, trading near $313, and has declined roughly 16% over the past month. This retreat coincides with broader semiconductor equipment sector weakness linked to TSMC's capex recalibration and ASML-related selling pressure. Despite the near-term volatility, institutional ownership remains high at approximately 85%, and several major Wall Street firms — including Morgan Stanley, Susquehanna, and Cantor Fitzgerald — have raised price targets on LRCX, citing durable AI-driven equipment spending that could extend into 2028 and beyond.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

MU, or Micron Technology, is one of the world's largest memory and storage semiconductor manufacturers, producing DRAM (dynamic random-access memory) and NAND flash memory products used across data centers, personal computers, smartphones, and automotive applications. Based in Boise, Idaho, Micron has emerged as a primary beneficiary of the AI data center expansion, with its HBM products seeing explosive demand. In its most recent reported quarter (fiscal Q3 2025), Micron posted revenue of $9.30 billion, representing 37% year-over-year growth, with DRAM alone accounting for 76% of total revenue and growing 51% from the prior year. The company's trailing twelve-month revenue now exceeds $90 billion, and net income surpasses $50 billion. However, MU shares have experienced a notable correction in recent weeks, falling approximately 19% over the past month from levels above $1,040 to around $849, and pulling back from an all-time high of $1,255 reached in late June. With a beta of 2.14, Micron exhibits significantly higher volatility than the broader market, reflecting the inherently cyclical nature of memory chip pricing. The company maintains a strong balance sheet with over $10.8 billion in cash and investments, though total debt of roughly $15.5 billion warrants monitoring in a capital-intensive industry.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like LRCX versus MU, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most promising algorithmic trading tools. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots covering thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in the Trending section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — from swing trading to longer-term trend following — and span a wide range of timeframes, performance metrics, and underlying strategies. Many of the featured robots have generated compelling historical returns by analyzing technical patterns, momentum signals, and volatility characteristics across individual stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). By focusing exclusively on bots that are currently performing well in real-time conditions, this section helps users cut through the noise and identify AI-driven strategies worth closer examination.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most important distinction between LRCX and MU lies in their positions within the semiconductor value chain. Lam Research is an equipment supplier — it sells the tools that chipmakers like Micron, Samsung, and TSMC use to fabricate semiconductors. This "picks-and-shovels" model provides revenue diversification across multiple customers and end markets but also ties Lam's fortunes to aggregate industry capex cycles. Micron, by contrast, is a pure-play memory producer whose revenue and profitability are directly exposed to DRAM and NAND pricing dynamics. When memory prices rise, Micron's earnings can expand dramatically; when they fall, margins compress just as quickly. This cyclicality is reflected in MU's higher beta (2.14 versus LRCX's 1.80) and its more dramatic historical swings between profitability and loss-making quarters.

On valuation, the contrast is stark. MU trades at a trailing P/E near 19 and a forward P/E of approximately 5.5, while LRCX commands a trailing P/E of roughly 59 and a forward multiple near 40. This gap partly reflects the market's expectation that Micron's current earnings surge — driven by extraordinarily high memory pricing — may normalize over time, whereas Lam's equipment revenue is seen as benefiting from a longer, more predictable investment cycle. LRCX also pays a modest quarterly dividend (yielding approximately 0.3%), which MU currently matches but at similarly low yield levels. In terms of growth trajectory, both companies are riding the AI wave, but through different mechanisms: Lam benefits from every new fabrication facility built, while Micron benefits from the volume and pricing of the memory chips those facilities produce. Risk factors diverge as well — Lam faces geopolitical headwinds related to China export restrictions (China accounted for roughly 35% of recent revenue), while Micron contends with the perpetual risk of memory oversupply and pricing collapses.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend patterns, relative stability, and the nature of each company's exposure to the current AI cycle, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a modest preference for LRCX in the present market environment. While MU has delivered more explosive revenue and earnings growth over the trailing twelve months, its higher beta and recent drawdown from the June highs suggest greater sensitivity to shifts in market sentiment and memory pricing expectations. LRCX's equipment-supplier business model, broader customer diversification, and the multi-year visibility implied by extended backlogs in wafer fabrication equipment spending provide a somewhat more consistent trend foundation. That said, the verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive — MU's dramatically lower forward P/E ratio could appeal strongly to value-oriented algorithms if memory pricing holds. Both stocks remain deeply tied to the AI semiconductor narrative, and relative positioning may shift quickly as new earnings data and capex guidance emerge in the weeks ahead.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LRCX vs. MU commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRCX is a Hold and MU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (LRCX: $319.78 vs. MU: $990.21)
Brand notoriety: LRCX and MU are both notable
LRCX represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while MU is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRCX: 46% vs. MU: 51%
Market capitalization -- LRCX: $399.91B vs. MU: $1.12T
LRCX [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $399.91B. MU’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $1.12T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $696.23B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $69.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $189.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRCX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LRCX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than LRCX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRCX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRCX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCX is a better buy in the short-term than MU.

Price Growth

LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +16.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.87%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRCX is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Sep 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+1.98% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+3.43% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($1.12T) has a higher market cap than LRCX($400B). LRCX has higher P/E ratio than MU: LRCX (60.45) vs MU (22.38). MU YTD gains are higher at: 247.142 vs. LRCX (87.165). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68.3B vs. LRCX (8.07B). MU has more cash in the bank: 26B vs. LRCX (1.68B). LRCX has less debt than MU: LRCX (3.73B) vs MU (6.38B). MU has higher revenues than LRCX: MU (90.3B) vs LRCX (21.7B).
LRCXMULRCX / MU
Capitalization400B1.12T36%
EBITDA8.07B68.3B12%
Gain YTD87.165247.14235%
P/E Ratio60.4522.38270%
Revenue21.7B90.3B24%
Total Cash1.68B26B6%
Total Debt3.73B6.38B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRCX vs MU: Fundamental Ratings
LRCX
MU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6462
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2016
SMR RATING
1..100
1717
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
733
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (57) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LRCX (87) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LRCX (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LRCX (17) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LRCX (37) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MU (33) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRCXMU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRCX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMCPX37.40N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Mid Cap 1
DCCRX33.13N/A
N/A
Nomura Small Cap Core R
PGIUX17.00N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras I
DMSFX10.25N/A
N/A
Destinations Multi Strategy Alts I
BGAKX13.20-0.18
-1.35%
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities K

MU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MU
1D Price
Change %
MU100%
+3.20%
LRCX - MU
80%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
KLAC - MU
72%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
AMAT - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
KLIC - MU
71%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
VECO - MU
70%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More