Advertisement
AMGN vs GRFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGN is a Hold and GRFS is a StrongBuy.
| AMGN | GRFS | AMGN / GRFS | |
| Capitalization | 204B | 6.8B | 3,001% |
| EBITDA | 17.6B | 1.72B | 1,026% |
| Gain YTD | 17.647 | -18.026 | -98% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.44 | 9.83 | 238% |
| Revenue | 38.1B | 7.42B | 513% |
| Total Cash | 14B | 529M | 2,647% |
| Total Debt | 57.3B | 8.52B | 673% |
AMGN | GRFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMGN's Valuation (7) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as GRFS (10) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMGN’s stock grew similarly to GRFS’s over the last 12 months.
AMGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRFS (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMGN’s stock grew significantly faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.
AMGN's SMR Rating (15) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRFS (76) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.
AMGN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as GRFS (59) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMGN’s stock grew similarly to GRFS’s over the last 12 months.
AMGN's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRFS (92) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRFS’s over the last 12 months.
| AMGN | GRFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 10 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 66% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMGN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while GRFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMGN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- GRFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMGN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMGN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GRFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMGN (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -13.70% price change this week, while GRFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -3.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMGN is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
GRFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-4.36% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ALPACA.X | 0.000750 | 0.000015 | +2.11% |
| Alpaca Finance cryptocurrency | |||
| GAL.X | 0.889084 | 0.017930 | +2.06% |
| Galatasaray Fan Token cryptocurrency | |||
| ORDI.X | 4.001650 | 0.053436 | +1.35% |
| ORDI cryptocurrency | |||
| ARDR.X | 0.024155 | -0.000577 | -2.33% |
| Ardor cryptocurrency | |||
| DOT.X | 1.040002 | -0.056028 | -5.11% |
| Polkadot cryptocurrency | |||
AMGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMGN has been loosely correlated with BIIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMGN jumps, then BIIB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMGN | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| BIIB - AMGN | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| PFE - AMGN | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| GILD - AMGN | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MRK - AMGN | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| ABBV - AMGN | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
GRFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRFS and NVS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRFS and NVS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRFS | 100% | -1.31% | ||
| NVS - GRFS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| SNY - GRFS | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| GSK - GRFS | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
| GILD - GRFS | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| AMGN - GRFS | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||