This comparison examines Amkor Technology (AMKR) and Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC), two semiconductor companies with complementary yet distinct roles in the technology ecosystem. Traders and investors focused on the semiconductor sector, including those evaluating supply-chain exposure or growth themes in electronics manufacturing and programmable solutions, may find this analysis relevant. The discussion highlights observable differences in business models, recent market behavior, and positioning amid broader industry dynamics.
Amkor Technology, Inc. operates as a provider of semiconductor packaging and test services, supporting advanced chip assembly for various applications. In recent weeks, the stock has shown notable movement tied to a strategic partnership with NVIDIA valued at $1.5 billion, aimed at expanding capacity for next-generation AI infrastructure. This development contributed to positive sentiment and price appreciation during the period. Broader market activity has reflected strength in AI-related supply chains, with the company also preparing to release second-quarter 2026 financial results. Performance over the past year has been robust, supported by demand trends in advanced packaging.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation focuses on low-power programmable devices, particularly FPGAs used in edge computing, industrial, and communications applications. Recent market activity has included positive developments such as inclusion on TIME’s America’s Best Companies 2026 list, based on factors including employee satisfaction and revenue growth, along with innovation awards for its product families. The company has scheduled its second-quarter 2026 earnings conference call for early August. Stock performance over the past year has remained solid, though subject to sector-wide influences and volatility observed in recent trading sessions.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker universes, with historical win rates and other statistics varying by bot. Readers interested in exploring automated trading approaches may visit the page for additional details on current trending options.
AMKR’s business model centers on outsourced semiconductor packaging and testing, positioning it as a key enabler in the manufacturing process with direct exposure to advanced packaging demand from AI chip producers. In contrast, LSCC emphasizes design and supply of programmable logic solutions, offering flexibility for customers in diverse end markets. Recent momentum for AMKR has been influenced by the NVIDIA collaboration, while LSCC has drawn attention through corporate recognitions and product innovations. Risk factors differ accordingly: AMKR faces potential concentration in AI supply chains and capacity expansion execution, whereas LSCC contends with broader technology spending cycles and competition in programmable devices. Sector exposure overlaps in semiconductors but diverges in value-chain placement, with AMKR more downstream in assembly and LSCC upstream in component design. Market sentiment in recent activity has reflected these distinctions, with each stock responding to company-specific catalysts amid shared industry tailwinds.
Based on observable factors such as recent trend consistency around major partnerships and relative positioning within AI-driven supply chains, Tickeron’s AI may currently assign a higher probability of favorable momentum to AMKR over the near term. LSCC shows stability supported by innovation awards and upcoming earnings visibility, yet the immediate catalyst profile appears comparatively less pronounced in recent market data. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to evolving conditions rather than a definitive outlook.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMKR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLSCC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMKR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSCC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMKR (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +6.63% price change this week, while LSCC (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +6.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.24%.
AMKR is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
LSCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+1.82% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| AMKR | LSCC | AMKR / LSCC | |
| Capitalization | 14.3B | 18.2B | 79% |
| EBITDA | 1.39B | 77.5M | 1,796% |
| Gain YTD | 46.719 | 74.545 | 63% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.90 | 513.68 | 5% |
| Revenue | 7.46B | 574M | 1,299% |
| Total Cash | 2.51B | 140M | 1,794% |
| Total Debt | 2.59B | 39.9M | 6,484% |
AMKR | LSCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMKR's Valuation (34) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (99). This means that AMKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LSCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMKR (60). This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to AMKR’s over the last 12 months.
AMKR's SMR Rating (64) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LSCC (89). This means that AMKR’s stock grew similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.
LSCC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMKR (49). This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to AMKR’s over the last 12 months.
LSCC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMKR (25). This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to AMKR’s over the last 12 months.
| AMKR | LSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMKR has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMKR jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMKR | 100% | +3.89% | ||
| RMBS - AMKR | 79% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| COHU - AMKR | 77% Closely correlated | +3.92% | ||
| AMAT - AMKR | 74% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| MPWR - AMKR | 74% Closely correlated | -4.38% | ||
| LSCC - AMKR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSCC | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| KLIC - LSCC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ENTG - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| KLAC - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| LRCX - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| DIOD - LSCC | 70% Closely correlated | -9.20% | ||
More | ||||