This stock comparison examines AMPL and GTM, two software firms navigating the competitive landscape of digital analytics and go-to-market (GTM) intelligence. Both leverage AI to enhance customer insights and sales efficiency, making them relevant for growth-oriented investors and traders tracking SaaS (software-as-a-service) trends. In recent market activity, earnings beats have been tempered by macroeconomic headwinds and profitability pressures, highlighting contrasts in scale, growth rates, and strategic positioning. Traders may find value in their relative performance amid sector rotation, while long-term investors assess catalysts like AI adoption and customer retention.
Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) provides an AI-powered digital analytics platform that analyzes customer behavior in digital products. Key offerings include real-time insights via Amplitude Analytics, session replay tools, experimentation features, and AI agents for goals like conversion optimization. Delivered as a SaaS model, it serves enterprises seeking product-led growth.
In recent quarters, AMPL has shown revenue acceleration, with Q1 2026 revenue reaching $93.5 million, up 17% year-over-year, and annual recurring revenue (ARR) climbing to $374 million. Dollar-based net retention rate (a measure of customer expansion) stood at 105% trailing twelve months, with 727 customers exceeding $100,000 ARR, up 18%. However, non-GAAP operating losses persisted at $3.1 million, influenced by rising AI inference costs that compressed gross margins to 75%. Stock sentiment has been volatile, with post-earnings dips reflecting concerns over path to profitability despite beats, amid broader software sector pressures.
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) offers a go-to-market intelligence platform aiding sales, marketing, operations, and recruiting. Its cloud-based tools provide data on organizations and professionals, predictive scoring, buying signals, and automation via products like ZoomInfo Copilot and SalesOS. Targeting enterprises across industries, it emphasizes upmarket expansion.
Recent market activity for GTM reflects resilience in profitability amid modest growth. Q1 2026 revenue hit $310.2 million, up 1.5% year-over-year, beating guidance with adjusted operating income of $109.7 million (35% margin). Upmarket average contract value (ACV) grew 5%, while downmarket faced declines. The company recently changed its ticker to GTM to align with its core focus. Full-year guidance was cautious at $1.185-1.205 billion revenue due to macro challenges and pricing shifts from seat-based to consumption models, prompting share drops despite operational strength.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. Only 25 out of 351 total bots earn a spot in this dynamic section, selected by AI analysis for their suitability to current market conditions like momentum in tech and growth areas. These bots boast impressive stats, including annualized returns up to 279%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0 in top performers on stocks and ETFs. With styles ranging from short-term scalping to swing trading, they adapt to volatility. Investors can explore these for pattern-based signals; visit Trending AI Robots to review live performance and copy top strategies.
AMPL and GTM both thrive in AI-enhanced SaaS but differ in business models: AMPL focuses on product analytics for user behavior, driving experimentation and retention, while GTM targets sales intelligence for lead generation and engagement. Growth drivers contrast sharply—AMPL at 17% revenue pace with strong net retention versus GTM's 1.5% top-line but superior 35% margins.
Recent momentum favors GTM's scale ($1.2B market cap) over AMPL's ($846M), though both saw post-earnings weakness. Risk factors include AMPL's losses and AI costs versus GTM's macro sensitivity and pricing transitions. Sector exposure overlaps in software but GTM diversifies via multi-industry data. Market sentiment tilts toward GTM's profitability trade-off against AMPL's higher growth potential.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors GTM due to its larger revenue base, superior margins, and positive unlevered free cash flow, offering greater stability in uncertain conditions. While AMPL exhibits stronger growth and retention trends with AI analytics tailwinds, its ongoing losses introduce higher volatility. Probabilistic edge to GTM for trend consistency and relative positioning, though both warrant monitoring for catalysts like earnings execution.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMPL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMPL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while GTM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.88%.
AMPL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
GTM is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| AMPL | GTM | AMPL / GTM | |
| Capitalization | 885M | 800M | 111% |
| EBITDA | -85.87M | 333M | -26% |
| Gain YTD | -42.401 | -73.304 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.61 | - |
| Revenue | 357M | 1.25B | 28% |
| Total Cash | 182M | 175M | 104% |
| Total Debt | 10.1M | 1.57B | 1% |
GTM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMPL | GTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMPL has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMPL jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMPL | 100% | +3.25% | ||
| FRSH - AMPL | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| CLSK - AMPL | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| PCOR - AMPL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| PATH - AMPL | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RIOT - AMPL | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTM | 100% | +2.45% | ||
| COIN - GTM | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.04% | ||
| HUBS - GTM | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CLSK - GTM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CRM - GTM | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| DOCU - GTM | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||