GTM
Price
$3.08
Change
+$0.16 (+5.48%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
906.26M
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBS
Price
$217.59
Change
+$10.11 (+4.87%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.14B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTM vs HUBS

GTM vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTM vs. HUBS commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTM is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (GTM: $3.08 vs. HUBS: $217.59)
Brand notoriety: GTM and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTM: 52% vs. HUBS: 66%
Market capitalization -- GTM: $906.26M vs. HUBS: $11.14B
GTM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $906.26M. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTM is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTM is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

GTM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +12.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTM is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.53% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($11.1B) has a higher market cap than GTM($906M). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than GTM: HUBS (114.52) vs GTM (7.69). HUBS YTD gains are higher at: -45.779 vs. GTM (-69.715). GTM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 333M vs. HUBS (267M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. GTM (175M). HUBS has less debt than GTM: HUBS (247M) vs GTM (1.57B). HUBS has higher revenues than GTM: HUBS (3.3B) vs GTM (1.25B).
GTMHUBSGTM / HUBS
Capitalization906M11.1B8%
EBITDA333M267M125%
Gain YTD-69.715-45.779152%
P/E Ratio7.69114.527%
Revenue1.25B3.3B38%
Total Cash175M1.69B10%
Total Debt1.57B247M636%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTM vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
GTM
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
186
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7986
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTM's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GTM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

GTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GTM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

GTM's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GTM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GTM (65) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to GTM’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GTM (100) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to GTM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTEX40.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock M
VEXAX183.06N/A
N/A
Vanguard Extended Market Index Admiral
BRSIX18.31N/A
N/A
Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company Market
DMIDX30.72N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I
NWXQX17.86N/A
N/A
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Idx Instl Svc

GTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTM has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTM
1D Price
Change %
GTM100%
+5.48%
HUBS - GTM
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.87%
COIN - GTM
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
CLSK - GTM
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
DOCU - GTM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
BLKB - GTM
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.87%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+4.87%
CRM - HUBS
78%
Closely correlated
+4.84%
TEAM - HUBS
73%
Closely correlated
+8.22%
ASAN - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
+4.91%
DOCU - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
BRZE - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
+5.85%
More