Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMRBX vs RGACX
AMRBX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts AMRBX vs RGACX
AMRBX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMRBX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMRBX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AMRBX (19.9M). AMRBX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . AMRBX was incepted earlier than RGACX: AMRBX (30 years) vs RGACX (24 years). AMRBX (6.28) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMRBX (8.00). AMRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: AMRBX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. AMRBX (-2.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. AMRBX (-26.79).
| AMRBX | RGACX | AMRBX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.28 | 0.93 | 675% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.28 | 0.93 | 675% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 6.959 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 3.68 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.05 | 37.13 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.79 | 13.46 | -199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.31 | 97.58 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement