Ad is loading...
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
AMUB vs CQP
AMUB vs CQP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMUB vs. CQP commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMUB is a StrongBuy and CQP is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMQIX | 7.98 | -0.02 | -0.25% |
| Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq Instl | |||
| PAGSX | 64.87 | -0.96 | -1.46% |
| T. Rowe Price Global Stock Adv | |||
| GTCEX | 30.80 | -0.46 | -1.47% |
| Glenmede Strategic Equity | |||
| JFARX | 38.58 | -0.58 | -1.48% |
| JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core R4 | |||
| FGJMX | 109.35 | -2.08 | -1.87% |
| Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesI | |||
AMUB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMUB and CQP have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMUB and CQP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMUB | 100% | N/A | ||
| CQP - AMUB | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| GEL - AMUB | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
| USAC - AMUB | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| VNOM - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ARLP - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||
CQP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with GEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then GEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQP | 100% | +1.61% | ||
| GEL - CQP | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| ENLC - CQP | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| PAA - CQP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| ET - CQP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| PAGP - CQP | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||