CQP | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CQP | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMUB and CQP have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMUB and CQP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMUB | 100% | N/A | ||
CQP - AMUB | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
GEL - AMUB | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
USAC - AMUB | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
VNOM - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.69% | ||
ARLP - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with GLP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then GLP could also see price increases.