ANPA saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 25 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 23 of the 25 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ANPA turned negative on October 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 4 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 3 of the 4 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 75%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ANPA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for ANPA entered a downward trend on October 20, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 11 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +13.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ANPA advanced for three days, in 48 of 55 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
ANPA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.214) is normal, around the industry mean (5.887). ANPA has a moderately high P/E Ratio (169.565) as compared to the industry average of (33.618). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.946). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.025) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.155) is also within normal values, averaging (9.907).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. ANPA’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ANPA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock worse than average.
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where CBZ advanced for three days, in 219 of 340 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 164 of 268 cases where CBZ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 61%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for CBZ moved out of overbought territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 35 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 15 of the 35 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 43%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CBZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
CBZ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CBZ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.617) is normal, around the industry mean (5.887). P/E Ratio (26.306) is within average values for comparable stocks, (33.618). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.219) is also within normal values, averaging (1.946). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.025) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.214) is also within normal values, averaging (9.907).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CBZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
CBZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ANPA | CBZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 61% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANPA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CBZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANPA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
ANPA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -12.59% price change this week, while CBZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.18%.
CBZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2027.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
A.I.dvisor tells us that ANPA and CBZ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANPA and CBZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANPA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANPA | 100% | -2.48% | ||
| CBZ - ANPA | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THH - ANPA | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| YSXT - ANPA | 6% Poorly correlated | +12.30% | ||
| CRE - ANPA | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
| TIC - ANPA | 2% Poorly correlated | +7.80% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBZ has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBZ jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXPO - CBZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| FA - CBZ | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| LZ - CBZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -12.09% | ||
| FCN - CBZ | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| RELX - CBZ | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.09% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QTJA | 32.84 | 0.49 | +1.51% |
| Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) | |||
| QMAG | 24.80 | 0.19 | +0.78% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August (QMAG) | |||
| FSIG | 18.62 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) | |||
| SMOT | 40.96 | -0.21 | -0.50% |
| VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) | |||
| STLU | 10.44 | -0.10 | -0.98% |
| Volatility Shares 2x Stellar ETF (STLU) | |||