Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs MGGPX
ANWFX vs MGGPX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs MGGPX
ANWFX vs MGGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. MGGPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and MGGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGGPX (3.02B). ANWFX pays higher dividends than MGGPX: ANWFX (1.15) vs MGGPX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than MGGPX: ANWFX (18 years) vs MGGPX (16 years). MGGPX (1.22) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). ANWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MGGPX (11.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGGPX: ANWFX (250) vs MGGPX (1000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. MGGPX (-2.47). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.19 vs. MGGPX (-23.24).
| ANWFX | MGGPX | ANWFX / MGGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.22 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.22 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 7.051 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 3.02B | 5,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | -2.47 | -551% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.79 | 38.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | -23.24 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.22 | 128.17 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement