Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWTFX
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWTFX
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWTFX commentary
Jun 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FWTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWTFX (4B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FWTFX (0.07). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWTFX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FWTFX (17 years). FWTFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX initial investment is less costly to investors than FWTFX (4%) vs FWTFX (4%). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWTFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FWTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.09 vs. ANWPX (9.77). FWTFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.46 vs. ANWPX (14.25).
| ANWPX | FWTFX | ANWPX / FWTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.32 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.32 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.441 | 20.880 | 16% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 4B | 4,096% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.07 | 1,416% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 26.09 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.30 | 54.00 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.25 | 16.46 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.48 | 94.65 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement