Ad is loading...
ANWPX vs FWTFX
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWTFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$58.65
Change+$4.28 (+7.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$30.19
Change+$2.42 (+8.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWTFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FWTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. FWTFX (2.95B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: ANWPX (0.58) vs FWTFX (0.35). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWTFX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FWTFX (16 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX initial investment is less costly to investors than FWTFX (4%) vs FWTFX (4%). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWTFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.70 vs. FWTFX (-20.99). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.93 vs. FWTFX (15.71).
| ANWPX | FWTFX | ANWPX / FWTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.462 | -17.621 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123B | 2.95B | 4,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.35 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.70 | -20.99 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.78 | -9.24 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.93 | 15.71 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.33 | 18.85 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...