Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWTFX
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWTFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$70.85
Change-$0.27 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.11B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$36.36
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWTFX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FWTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FWTFX (3.37B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: ANWPX (0.50) vs FWTFX (0.30). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWTFX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FWTFX (17 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX initial investment is less costly to investors than FWTFX (4%) vs FWTFX (4%). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWTFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. FWTFX (-2.10). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.08 vs. FWTFX (12.98).
| ANWPX | FWTFX | ANWPX / FWTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.507 | 8.128 | 178% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 3.37B | 4,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.30 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.40 | -2.10 | -542% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 32.59 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.08 | 12.98 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.11 | 71.42 | 147% |