Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs PGRCX
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$69.92
Change-$0.42 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.59B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$55.02
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. PGRCX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and PGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: ANWPX (0.51) vs PGRCX (0.02). ANWPX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: ANWPX (52 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: ANWPX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.71 vs. PGRCX (-7.87). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.98 vs. PGRCX (13.80).
| ANWPX | PGRCX | ANWPX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.574 | 7.814 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 1.04B | 15,096% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.02 | 3,122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | -7.87 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.18 | 15.38 | 307% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.98 | 13.80 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.86 | 11.43 | 716% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement