Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs PGRCX
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$55.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. PGRCX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and PGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. PGRCX (1.03B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: ANWPX (0.50) vs PGRCX (0.02). ANWPX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: ANWPX (52 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: ANWPX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. PGRCX (-7.24). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.86 vs. PGRCX (4.74).
| ANWPX | PGRCX | ANWPX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.199 | 8.048 | 189% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 1.03B | 15,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 3,105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | -7.24 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.37 | 9.21 | 460% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.86 | 4.74 | 672% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | 20.82 | 461% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement