Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs PGRCX
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$73.59
Change+$0.11 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$56.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. PGRCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and PGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. PGRCX (1.04B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: ANWPX (0.50) vs PGRCX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: ANWPX (53 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: ANWPX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.16 vs. PGRCX (-4.47). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 39.20 vs. PGRCX (11.20).
| ANWPX | PGRCX | ANWPX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.483 | 10.405 | 178% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 1.04B | 15,673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.16 | -4.47 | -339% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.19 | 17.44 | 299% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.20 | 11.20 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.47 | 24.59 | 421% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement