Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs PGRCX
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs PGRCX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$70.53
Change+$1.23 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.03B
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
Price$54.40
Change+$0.80 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets998.77M
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. PGRCX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and PGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. PGRCX (999M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: ANWPX (0.50) vs PGRCX (0.02). ANWPX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: ANWPX (52 years) vs PGRCX (30 years). PGRCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGRCX (13.83). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: ANWPX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.18 vs. PGRCX (-6.15). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.19 vs. PGRCX (7.43).
| ANWPX | PGRCX | ANWPX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.89 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.557 | 4.443 | 305% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 999M | 15,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 3,105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.18 | -6.15 | -279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.54 | 2.92 | 1,252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.19 | 7.43 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.68 | 10.03 | 844% |