Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs RGPAX
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$73.39
Change-$0.20 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets501.55M
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. RGPAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. RGPAX (502M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: ANWPX (0.50) vs RGPAX (0.36). ANWPX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: ANWPX (53 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX (6%) and RGPAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: ANWPX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX (15.52) and ANWPX (14.83) have marching annual gain over last year. RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.85 vs. ANWPX (39.44).
| ANWPX | RGPAX | ANWPX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.00 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 8.20 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.161 | 14.451 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 502M | 32,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.36 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.83 | 15.52 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.78 | 49.25 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.44 | 44.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement