Ad is loading...
ANWPX vs RGPAX
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$54.87
Change-$0.68 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.29B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$18.30
Change-$0.22 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.44M
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. RGPAX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. RGPAX (449M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: ANWPX (0.58) vs RGPAX (0.41). ANWPX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: ANWPX (52 years) vs RGPAX (5 years). RGPAX (8.52) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX (6%) and RGPAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: ANWPX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.61 vs. ANWPX (-8.63). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.50 vs. ANWPX (39.13).
| ANWPX | RGPAX | ANWPX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.00 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 8.52 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.657 | -10.488 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 125B | 449M | 27,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.63 | -3.61 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.91 | -0.59 | 834% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.13 | 45.50 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...