AORT
Price
$26.83
Change
-$0.84 (-3.04%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LMAT
Price
$101.32
Change
-$0.87 (-0.85%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.32B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AORT vs LMAT

AORT vs LMAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Artivion (AORT) vs. LeMaitre Vascular (LMAT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Artivion (AORT) is a high-growth cardiac and aortic surgery device company with revenue expanding at a double-digit pace, yet the stock has posted a year-to-date decline exceeding 40% amid broader volatility.
  • LeMaitre Vascular (LMAT) has delivered consistent double-digit revenue growth with industry-leading net margins near 24% and a year-to-date gain of roughly 28%.
  • LeMaitre offers a growing dividend (yield around 0.87%) with 14 consecutive years of increases; Artivion pays no dividend and reinvests aggressively into its clinical pipeline.
  • Artivion carries significantly higher valuation multiples (P/E of approximately 114) and higher beta (1.25) compared to LeMaitre (P/E of roughly 38, beta of 0.52).
  • Both companies operate in the medical device space but target distinct surgical sub-specialties, creating different risk-reward profiles for investors.
  • Wall Street analysts currently assign a "Strong Buy" consensus to Artivion with a price target implying over 50% upside, while rating LeMaitre a "Moderate Buy."

Introduction

Investors tracking the medical device sector often encounter two specialized names that, while operating in adjacent surgical niches, present markedly different investment profiles. AORT (Artivion, Inc.) focuses on cardiac and aortic surgery, serving a global market with stent grafts, mechanical heart valves, and tissue preservation services. LMAT (LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.) centers on peripheral vascular disease, supplying implants and disposable devices to vascular surgeons worldwide. This comparison examines how these two companies stack up across growth trajectories, profitability, market sentiment, and risk characteristics — offering a side-by-side view relevant to growth-oriented investors, income seekers, and anyone evaluating relative positioning within healthcare.

AORT Overview and Recent Performance

Artivion, formerly known as CryoLife until its 2022 rebranding, develops and manufactures medical devices and preserves human tissues used in cardiac and vascular surgical procedures for patients with aortic disease. The company operates across four major product groups: aortic stent grafts, surgical sealants, On-X mechanical heart valves, and implantable cardiac and vascular human tissues, with a presence in more than 100 countries.

In recent quarters, Artivion has demonstrated robust commercial momentum. For the full year 2025, the company reported non-GAAP revenue of approximately $443.6 million, representing roughly 13% constant currency growth. Stent graft revenues surged by 36% year-over-year on a constant currency basis in the fourth quarter, while On-X heart valves grew 24%, driven by new clinical data supporting their use in younger patient populations. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached $89.6 million for the full year, a 26% increase, with margins expanding meaningfully.

Despite this operational strength, AORT shares have experienced considerable pressure. The stock traded near $27.55 in recent sessions, down roughly 41% year-to-date and substantially below its 52-week high of $48.25. Contributing factors include investor concerns around elevated spending on clinical trials, lingering effects from a prior cybersecurity incident that constrained tissue processing revenue, and broader rotations away from higher-multiple growth names. On the catalyst front, the company filed the final PMA (Premarket Approval) module for its AMDS hybrid prosthesis, with FDA approval anticipated by mid-2026, and the NEXUS endovascular stent graft system represents another potential regulatory milestone later in the year.

LMAT Overview and Recent Performance

LeMaitre Vascular, headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts, specializes in devices, implants, and services for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease — a condition affecting over 200 million people globally. The company's diversified product portfolio includes grafts, catheters, shunts, valvulotomes, and biologic patches, all marketed primarily to vascular surgeons through a direct sales force.

LeMaitre has delivered steady and profitable growth in recent periods. Full-year 2025 revenue reached approximately $249 million, reflecting 14% organic growth, while net income climbed to roughly $57.7 million. The company's gross margin expanded to 71.7% in the fourth quarter, and operating margin hit 29%, highlighting the benefits of pricing power, manufacturing efficiencies, and disciplined expense management. Grafts and shunts have been standout product categories, while the international launch of Artegraft biologic grafts has exceeded initial expectations, contributing meaningfully to EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) sales growth of 29% in the most recent quarter.

In the market, LMAT shares have reflected this consistent execution. Trading near $103.57 in recent sessions, the stock has gained roughly 28% year-to-date and approximately 27% over the trailing twelve months. With a beta of just 0.52, LeMaitre has exhibited substantially lower volatility than the broader market. The company also raised its quarterly dividend by 25% to $0.25 per share and authorized a $100 million share repurchase program, signaling confidence in its cash generation. The balance sheet remains strong with $359 million in cash and securities at year-end 2025, providing ample capacity for potential M&A (mergers and acquisitions).

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. While Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. The bots span a wide variety of trading styles — from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and each comes with its own track record, statistical profile, and set of traded tickers. Some bots showcased on the page have generated annualized returns in the double digits, and the platform provides transparency into metrics such as win rates, drawdown levels, and trade frequency. For traders and investors interested in automating their decision-making with data-driven tools, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can offer a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both companies operate in the medical device sector, the contrast between Artivion and LeMaitre Vascular is striking across nearly every financial dimension.

Business Model and Market Focus: Artivion targets cardiac and aortic surgeons with a mix of high-acuity implantable devices (stent grafts, mechanical heart valves) and tissue preservation services. Its growth relies heavily on new product introductions, regulatory approvals, and clinical trial outcomes. LeMaitre, by contrast, serves vascular surgeons with a broad portfolio of established disposable and implantable devices used in peripheral procedures — a more predictable, replacement-driven market.

Growth vs. Profitability: Artivion's revenue growth in the mid-teens percentage range outpaces LeMaitre's low-to-mid-teens growth, but LeMaitre converts far more of that revenue into profit. LeMaitre's net margin of approximately 24% dwarfs Artivion's roughly 2.5%, reflecting LeMaitre's asset-light manufacturing model, pricing power, and absence of large-scale clinical trial expenses.

Risk Profile: With a beta of 1.25, Artivion is roughly 25% more volatile than the S&P 500, while LeMaitre's beta of 0.52 suggests it moves at roughly half the market's amplitude. Artivion also faces binary regulatory risk tied to AMDS and NEXUS approval timelines. LeMaitre's risk factors are more operational — including the integration of potential acquisitions and a cyber incident disclosed in early 2026 that management described as minimally disruptive.

Capital Allocation: LeMaitre returns capital to shareholders through a growing dividend (14 consecutive years of increases) and an active buyback program. Artivion reinvests substantially all free cash flow into its clinical pipeline, R&D (research and development), and manufacturing infrastructure — a profile more suited to investors prioritizing long-term capital appreciation over current income.

Valuation: LeMaitre trades at approximately 38 times trailing earnings and roughly 9 times sales, while Artivion trades at around 114 times earnings and approximately 3 times sales — reflecting the market's willingness to pay a premium for Artivion's pipeline optionality despite its lower current profitability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, stability metrics, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor LMAT in the current environment — but with an important caveat. LeMaitre's combination of consistent earnings growth, expanding margins, positive price momentum, low beta, and shareholder-friendly capital allocation creates a steadier and more statistically reliable trend profile, which many AI models are designed to identify and prioritize. Artivion, while demonstrating strong operational momentum and commanding significant analyst enthusiasm, carries higher volatility, a larger drawdown from its 52-week high, and heavier dependence on binary regulatory catalysts. That said, AI systems employing momentum or contrarian strategies may identify Artivion's sharp year-to-date decline and substantial analyst upside target as an opportunity — making the verdict contingent on the specific algorithm's timeframe and risk parameters. On balance, LeMaitre's trend consistency and lower risk profile give it the probabilistic edge under most systematic frameworks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AORT vs. LMAT commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AORT is a StrongBuy and LMAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AORT: $26.83 vs. LMAT: $101.32)
Brand notoriety: AORT and LMAT are both not notable
AORT represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while LMAT is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AORT: 84% vs. LMAT: 50%
Market capitalization -- AORT: $1.3B vs. LMAT: $2.32B
AORT [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $1.3B. LMAT’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $2.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $182.9B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $124.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $8.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AORT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AORT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LMAT is a better buy in the long-term than AORT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AORT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AORT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LMAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AORT and LMAT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AORT (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +6.13% price change this week, while LMAT (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +5.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.67%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

AORT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

LMAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.50% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+5.03% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMAT($2.32B) has a higher market cap than AORT($1.3B). AORT has higher P/E ratio than LMAT: AORT (107.32) vs LMAT (37.25). LMAT YTD gains are higher at: 25.531 vs. AORT (-41.175). LMAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.3M vs. AORT (65.1M). LMAT has more cash in the bank: 367M vs. AORT (55.8M). LMAT has less debt than AORT: LMAT (190M) vs AORT (258M). AORT has higher revenues than LMAT: AORT (459M) vs LMAT (256M).
AORTLMATAORT / LMAT
Capitalization1.3B2.32B56%
EBITDA65.1M96.3M68%
Gain YTD-41.17525.531-161%
P/E Ratio107.3237.25288%
Revenue459M256M179%
Total Cash55.8M367M15%
Total Debt258M190M136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AORT vs LMAT: Fundamental Ratings
AORT
LMAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
8854
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9363
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LMAT's Valuation (17) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for AORT (92). This means that LMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than AORT’s over the last 12 months.

LMAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for AORT (100). This means that LMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than AORT’s over the last 12 months.

LMAT's SMR Rating (54) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AORT (88). This means that LMAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AORT’s over the last 12 months.

LMAT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as AORT (61). This means that LMAT’s stock grew similarly to AORT’s over the last 12 months.

LMAT's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as AORT (93). This means that LMAT’s stock grew similarly to AORT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AORTLMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AORT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LMAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGAAX72.690.84
+1.17%
American Funds Growth Fd of Amer R-1
ASLAX14.510.06
+0.42%
AB Select US Long/Short A
PAGRX151.420.24
+0.16%
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth I
ATHAX16.69-0.04
-0.24%
American Century Heritage A
GCINX16.59-0.19
-1.13%
Green Century MSCI Intl Indx Indvl Inv

AORT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AORT has been loosely correlated with VREX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AORT jumps, then VREX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AORT
1D Price
Change %
AORT100%
-3.04%
VREX - AORT
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
TCMD - AORT
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
LMAT - AORT
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
ISRG - AORT
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
UTMD - AORT
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
More

LMAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMAT has been loosely correlated with ITGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMAT jumps, then ITGR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMAT
1D Price
Change %
LMAT100%
-0.85%
ITGR - LMAT
48%
Loosely correlated
+20.18%
SYK - LMAT
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
UFPT - LMAT
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
AORT - LMAT
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.04%
RDNT - LMAT
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
More