Investors tracking the medical device sector often encounter two specialized names that, while operating in adjacent surgical niches, present markedly different investment profiles. AORT (Artivion, Inc.) focuses on cardiac and aortic surgery, serving a global market with stent grafts, mechanical heart valves, and tissue preservation services. LMAT (LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.) centers on peripheral vascular disease, supplying implants and disposable devices to vascular surgeons worldwide. This comparison examines how these two companies stack up across growth trajectories, profitability, market sentiment, and risk characteristics — offering a side-by-side view relevant to growth-oriented investors, income seekers, and anyone evaluating relative positioning within healthcare.
Artivion, formerly known as CryoLife until its 2022 rebranding, develops and manufactures medical devices and preserves human tissues used in cardiac and vascular surgical procedures for patients with aortic disease. The company operates across four major product groups: aortic stent grafts, surgical sealants, On-X mechanical heart valves, and implantable cardiac and vascular human tissues, with a presence in more than 100 countries.
In recent quarters, Artivion has demonstrated robust commercial momentum. For the full year 2025, the company reported non-GAAP revenue of approximately $443.6 million, representing roughly 13% constant currency growth. Stent graft revenues surged by 36% year-over-year on a constant currency basis in the fourth quarter, while On-X heart valves grew 24%, driven by new clinical data supporting their use in younger patient populations. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reached $89.6 million for the full year, a 26% increase, with margins expanding meaningfully.
Despite this operational strength, AORT shares have experienced considerable pressure. The stock traded near $27.55 in recent sessions, down roughly 41% year-to-date and substantially below its 52-week high of $48.25. Contributing factors include investor concerns around elevated spending on clinical trials, lingering effects from a prior cybersecurity incident that constrained tissue processing revenue, and broader rotations away from higher-multiple growth names. On the catalyst front, the company filed the final PMA (Premarket Approval) module for its AMDS hybrid prosthesis, with FDA approval anticipated by mid-2026, and the NEXUS endovascular stent graft system represents another potential regulatory milestone later in the year.
LeMaitre Vascular, headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts, specializes in devices, implants, and services for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease — a condition affecting over 200 million people globally. The company's diversified product portfolio includes grafts, catheters, shunts, valvulotomes, and biologic patches, all marketed primarily to vascular surgeons through a direct sales force.
LeMaitre has delivered steady and profitable growth in recent periods. Full-year 2025 revenue reached approximately $249 million, reflecting 14% organic growth, while net income climbed to roughly $57.7 million. The company's gross margin expanded to 71.7% in the fourth quarter, and operating margin hit 29%, highlighting the benefits of pricing power, manufacturing efficiencies, and disciplined expense management. Grafts and shunts have been standout product categories, while the international launch of Artegraft biologic grafts has exceeded initial expectations, contributing meaningfully to EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) sales growth of 29% in the most recent quarter.
In the market, LMAT shares have reflected this consistent execution. Trading near $103.57 in recent sessions, the stock has gained roughly 28% year-to-date and approximately 27% over the trailing twelve months. With a beta of just 0.52, LeMaitre has exhibited substantially lower volatility than the broader market. The company also raised its quarterly dividend by 25% to $0.25 per share and authorized a $100 million share repurchase program, signaling confidence in its cash generation. The balance sheet remains strong with $359 million in cash and securities at year-end 2025, providing ample capacity for potential M&A (mergers and acquisitions).
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. While Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. The bots span a wide variety of trading styles — from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and each comes with its own track record, statistical profile, and set of traded tickers. Some bots showcased on the page have generated annualized returns in the double digits, and the platform provides transparency into metrics such as win rates, drawdown levels, and trade frequency. For traders and investors interested in automating their decision-making with data-driven tools, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can offer a practical starting point.
Although both companies operate in the medical device sector, the contrast between Artivion and LeMaitre Vascular is striking across nearly every financial dimension.
Business Model and Market Focus: Artivion targets cardiac and aortic surgeons with a mix of high-acuity implantable devices (stent grafts, mechanical heart valves) and tissue preservation services. Its growth relies heavily on new product introductions, regulatory approvals, and clinical trial outcomes. LeMaitre, by contrast, serves vascular surgeons with a broad portfolio of established disposable and implantable devices used in peripheral procedures — a more predictable, replacement-driven market.
Growth vs. Profitability: Artivion's revenue growth in the mid-teens percentage range outpaces LeMaitre's low-to-mid-teens growth, but LeMaitre converts far more of that revenue into profit. LeMaitre's net margin of approximately 24% dwarfs Artivion's roughly 2.5%, reflecting LeMaitre's asset-light manufacturing model, pricing power, and absence of large-scale clinical trial expenses.
Risk Profile: With a beta of 1.25, Artivion is roughly 25% more volatile than the S&P 500, while LeMaitre's beta of 0.52 suggests it moves at roughly half the market's amplitude. Artivion also faces binary regulatory risk tied to AMDS and NEXUS approval timelines. LeMaitre's risk factors are more operational — including the integration of potential acquisitions and a cyber incident disclosed in early 2026 that management described as minimally disruptive.
Capital Allocation: LeMaitre returns capital to shareholders through a growing dividend (14 consecutive years of increases) and an active buyback program. Artivion reinvests substantially all free cash flow into its clinical pipeline, R&D (research and development), and manufacturing infrastructure — a profile more suited to investors prioritizing long-term capital appreciation over current income.
Valuation: LeMaitre trades at approximately 38 times trailing earnings and roughly 9 times sales, while Artivion trades at around 114 times earnings and approximately 3 times sales — reflecting the market's willingness to pay a premium for Artivion's pipeline optionality despite its lower current profitability.
Based on observable trend consistency, stability metrics, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor LMAT in the current environment — but with an important caveat. LeMaitre's combination of consistent earnings growth, expanding margins, positive price momentum, low beta, and shareholder-friendly capital allocation creates a steadier and more statistically reliable trend profile, which many AI models are designed to identify and prioritize. Artivion, while demonstrating strong operational momentum and commanding significant analyst enthusiasm, carries higher volatility, a larger drawdown from its 52-week high, and heavier dependence on binary regulatory catalysts. That said, AI systems employing momentum or contrarian strategies may identify Artivion's sharp year-to-date decline and substantial analyst upside target as an opportunity — making the verdict contingent on the specific algorithm's timeframe and risk parameters. On balance, LeMaitre's trend consistency and lower risk profile give it the probabilistic edge under most systematic frameworks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AORT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AORT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AORT (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +6.13% price change this week, while LMAT (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +5.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.67%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.71%.
AORT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
LMAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+5.03% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| AORT | LMAT | AORT / LMAT | |
| Capitalization | 1.3B | 2.32B | 56% |
| EBITDA | 65.1M | 96.3M | 68% |
| Gain YTD | -41.175 | 25.531 | -161% |
| P/E Ratio | 107.32 | 37.25 | 288% |
| Revenue | 459M | 256M | 179% |
| Total Cash | 55.8M | 367M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 258M | 190M | 136% |
AORT | LMAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMAT's Valuation (17) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for AORT (92). This means that LMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than AORT’s over the last 12 months.
LMAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for AORT (100). This means that LMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than AORT’s over the last 12 months.
LMAT's SMR Rating (54) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AORT (88). This means that LMAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AORT’s over the last 12 months.
LMAT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as AORT (61). This means that LMAT’s stock grew similarly to AORT’s over the last 12 months.
LMAT's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as AORT (93). This means that LMAT’s stock grew similarly to AORT’s over the last 12 months.
| AORT | LMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RGAAX | 72.69 | 0.84 | +1.17% |
| American Funds Growth Fd of Amer R-1 | |||
| ASLAX | 14.51 | 0.06 | +0.42% |
| AB Select US Long/Short A | |||
| PAGRX | 151.42 | 0.24 | +0.16% |
| Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth I | |||
| ATHAX | 16.69 | -0.04 | -0.24% |
| American Century Heritage A | |||
| GCINX | 16.59 | -0.19 | -1.13% |
| Green Century MSCI Intl Indx Indvl Inv | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AORT has been loosely correlated with VREX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AORT jumps, then VREX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AORT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AORT | 100% | -3.04% | ||
| VREX - AORT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| TCMD - AORT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| LMAT - AORT | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| ISRG - AORT | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| UTMD - AORT | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMAT has been loosely correlated with ITGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMAT jumps, then ITGR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMAT | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| ITGR - LMAT | 48% Loosely correlated | +20.18% | ||
| SYK - LMAT | 46% Loosely correlated | -6.42% | ||
| UFPT - LMAT | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| AORT - LMAT | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| RDNT - LMAT | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
More | ||||