Advertisement
APAM vs RGT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAM is a StrongBuy and RGT is a Hold.
APAM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| APAM | RGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% | 12 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 88% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while .
- APAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- APAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
APAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.54% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
APAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+1.16% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UPGR | 21.87 | 0.33 | +1.52% |
| Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) | |||
| MIN | 2.33 | 0.03 | +1.30% |
| Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund | |||
| QABA | 65.59 | 0.83 | +1.28% |
| First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) | |||
| CRBN | 257.79 | 2.15 | +0.84% |
| iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF (CRBN) | |||
| DRGN | 31.50 | -0.43 | -1.33% |
| Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) | |||
APAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APAM has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APAM jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APAM | 100% | -3.65% | ||
| TROW - APAM | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| BAM - APAM | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BLK - APAM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| FHI - APAM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| BX - APAM | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||
RGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGT has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGT jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGT | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| ESAB - RGT | 47% Loosely correlated | +4.34% | ||
| APG - RGT | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| GFF - RGT | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| APAM - RGT | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.65% | ||
| SII - RGT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||