APH
Price
$66.06
Change
+$0.47 (+0.72%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
79.43B
21 days until earnings call
LFUS
Price
$193.01
Change
-$3.73 (-1.90%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.77B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

APH vs LFUS

Header iconAPH vs LFUS Comparison
Open Charts APH vs LFUSBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$66.06
Change+$0.47 (+0.72%)
Volume$48.78K
Capitalization79.43B
Littelfuse
Price$193.01
Change-$3.73 (-1.90%)
Volume$5.7K
Capitalization4.77B
APH vs LFUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. LFUS commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a StrongBuy and LFUS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $65.59 vs. LFUS: $196.74)
Brand notoriety: APH and LFUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 119% vs. LFUS: 143%
Market capitalization -- APH: $79.43B vs. LFUS: $4.77B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $79.43B. LFUS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $82.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFUS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the long-term than LFUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LFUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the short-term than LFUS.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а -5.35% price change this week, while LFUS (@Electronic Components) price change was -9.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

LFUS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-4.90% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($79.4B) has a higher market cap than LFUS($4.77B). LFUS has higher P/E ratio than APH: LFUS (48.27) vs APH (34.41). APH YTD gains are higher at: -5.313 vs. LFUS (-16.282). APH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.8B vs. LFUS (321M). LFUS has less debt than APH: LFUS (931M) vs APH (6.89B). APH has higher revenues than LFUS: APH (15.2B) vs LFUS (2.19B).
APHLFUSAPH / LFUS
Capitalization79.4B4.77B1,664%
EBITDA3.8B321M1,184%
Gain YTD-5.313-16.28233%
P/E Ratio34.4148.2771%
Revenue15.2B2.19B694%
Total CashN/A726M-
Total Debt6.89B931M740%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs LFUS: Fundamental Ratings
APH
LFUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1853
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
964
SMR RATING
1..100
3785
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5182
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
536
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5025

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFUS's Valuation (24) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as APH (48) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (64) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

APH's SMR Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (85) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (82) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (53) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHLFUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITB39.200.76
+1.98%
Fifth Third Bancorp
TRNS74.451.07
+1.46%
Transcat
CKPT4.04N/A
N/A
Checkpoint Therapeutics
ENS91.58-1.53
-1.64%
EnerSys
FTFT0.17N/A
-2.35%
Future FinTech Group

LFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFUS
1D Price
Change %
LFUS100%
-2.10%
KN - LFUS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
CTS - LFUS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
SANM - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
OLED - LFUS
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
TEL - LFUS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More