APH vs LFUS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a Hold and LFUS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLFUS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- APH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LFUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а +2.50% price change this week, while LFUS (@Electronic Components) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
APH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
LFUS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+0.17% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| APH | LFUS | APH / LFUS | |
| Capitalization | 89.5B | 6.05B | 1,480% |
| EBITDA | 3.5B | 426M | 821% |
| Gain YTD | 51.330 | -7.925 | -648% |
| P/E Ratio | 42.56 | 31.33 | 136% |
| Revenue | 14.2B | 2.2B | 647% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.48B | 930M | 590% |
APH | LFUS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFUS's Valuation (26) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (68) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.
APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (52) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
APH's SMR Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (76) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
APH's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (56) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as APH (28) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.
| APH | LFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 47% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VTES | 100.72 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exmpt Bd ETF | |||
| XJUL | 35.64 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Jul | |||
| SCHK | 29.14 | -0.16 | -0.55% |
| Schwab 1000 ETF | |||
| MFUS | 51.08 | -0.33 | -0.64% |
| PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor US Eq ETF | |||
| SNPV | 32.18 | -0.84 | -2.55% |
| Xtrackers S&P 500 Value ESG ETF | |||
LFUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been loosely correlated with CTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then CTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | 100% | -2.32% | ||
| CTS - LFUS | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| PLXS - LFUS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| KN - LFUS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| OLED - LFUS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| BHE - LFUS | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||