APH
Price
$75.85
Change
-$0.18 (-0.24%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
92.13B
89 days until earnings call
LFUS
Price
$176.06
Change
-$0.52 (-0.29%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.36B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

APH vs LFUS

Header iconAPH vs LFUS Comparison
Open Charts APH vs LFUSBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$75.85
Change-$0.18 (-0.24%)
Volume$50.2K
Capitalization92.13B
Littelfuse
Price$176.06
Change-$0.52 (-0.29%)
Volume$854
Capitalization4.36B
APH vs LFUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. LFUS commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a Buy and LFUS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $76.03 vs. LFUS: $176.58)
Brand notoriety: APH and LFUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 164% vs. LFUS: 139%
Market capitalization -- APH: $92.13B vs. LFUS: $4.36B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $92.13B. LFUS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $92.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFUS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the long-term than LFUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LFUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the short-term than LFUS.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а +16.86% price change this week, while LFUS (@Electronic Components) price change was +14.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

LFUS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+4.19% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($92.1B) has a higher market cap than LFUS($4.36B). LFUS has higher P/E ratio than APH: LFUS (44.15) vs APH (36.82). APH YTD gains are higher at: 9.758 vs. LFUS (-24.860). APH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.8B vs. LFUS (321M). LFUS has less debt than APH: LFUS (931M) vs APH (6.89B). APH has higher revenues than LFUS: APH (15.2B) vs LFUS (2.19B).
APHLFUSAPH / LFUS
Capitalization92.1B4.36B2,110%
EBITDA3.8B321M1,184%
Gain YTD9.758-24.860-39%
P/E Ratio36.8244.1583%
Revenue15.2B2.19B694%
Total CashN/A726M-
Total Debt6.89B931M740%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs LFUS: Fundamental Ratings
APH
LFUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
771
SMR RATING
1..100
3785
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4889
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
468
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5036

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFUS's Valuation (25) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (69) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (71) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

APH's SMR Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (85) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (89) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (46) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHLFUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMLF60.601.38
+2.33%
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Eq Fac ETF
CVLC67.581.35
+2.04%
Calvert US Large-Cp Cor Rspnb ETF
DMF6.930.02
+0.36%
BNY Mellon Municipal Income
IRVH21.140.07
+0.33%
Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF
PSCC34.37-0.06
-0.17%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Stapl ETF

LFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with CTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then CTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFUS
1D Price
Change %
LFUS100%
+8.36%
CTS - LFUS
72%
Closely correlated
+3.53%
SANM - LFUS
68%
Closely correlated
+3.71%
BELFB - LFUS
67%
Closely correlated
+3.27%
KN - LFUS
67%
Closely correlated
+5.60%
ROG - LFUS
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.61%
More