APOG
Price
$40.74
Change
+$0.47 (+1.17%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
850.17M
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CSL
Price
$336.04
Change
+$4.49 (+1.35%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.6B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APOG vs CSL

APOG vs CSL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APOG vs. CSL commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APOG is a StrongBuy and CSL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (APOG: $40.74 vs. CSL: $336.04)
Brand notoriety: APOG and CSL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APOG: 34% vs. CSL: 68%
Market capitalization -- APOG: $850.17M vs. CSL: $13.6B
APOG [@Building Products] is valued at $850.17M. CSL’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $13.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $106.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APOG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than APOG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APOG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APOG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than APOG.

Price Growth

APOG (@Building Products) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while CSL (@Building Products) price change was -2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

APOG is expected to report earnings on Sep 22, 2026.

CSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-3.16% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($13.6B) has a higher market cap than APOG($850M). CSL has higher P/E ratio than APOG: CSL (19.62) vs APOG (12.77). APOG YTD gains are higher at: 14.353 vs. CSL (5.693). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.23B vs. APOG (154M). APOG has less debt than CSL: APOG (288M) vs CSL (2.88B). CSL has higher revenues than APOG: CSL (4.98B) vs APOG (1.4B).
APOGCSLAPOG / CSL
Capitalization850M13.6B6%
EBITDA154M1.23B13%
Gain YTD14.3535.693252%
P/E Ratio12.7719.6265%
Revenue1.4B4.98B28%
Total CashN/A771M-
Total Debt288M2.88B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APOG vs CSL: Fundamental Ratings
APOG
CSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5018
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9653
SMR RATING
1..100
6125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5171
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APOG's Valuation (9) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (20) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that APOG’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APOG (96) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than APOG’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (25) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APOG (61) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than APOG’s over the last 12 months.

APOG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (71) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that APOG’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as APOG (82) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to APOG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOGCSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APOG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDVYX9.650.09
+0.94%
MassMutual Diversified Value Svc
CSCCX23.240.19
+0.82%
Calvert Small-Cap C
PAECX20.91N/A
N/A
Franklin Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr C
SMCFX83.63-0.70
-0.83%
American Funds SMALLCAP World F-2
MGFYX7.79-0.08
-1.02%
MassMutual Global Svc

APOG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APOG has been loosely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APOG jumps, then IR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APOG
1D Price
Change %
APOG100%
+1.17%
IR - APOG
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
BXC - APOG
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
CSL - APOG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
BLDR - APOG
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.27%
NX - APOG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
More

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+1.35%
BLDR - CSL
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.27%
LPX - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.24%
GFF - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
MAS - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
LII - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
More