CSL
Price
$385.25
Change
-$2.24 (-0.58%)
Updated
Aug 10 closing price
Capitalization
15.3B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFF
Price
$104.80
Change
-$2.42 (-2.26%)
Updated
Aug 10 closing price
Capitalization
4.75B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs GFF

CSL vs GFF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. GFF commentary
Aug 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a StrongBuy and GFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2026
Stock price -- (CSL: $385.25 vs. GFF: $104.80)
Brand notoriety: CSL and GFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 70% vs. GFF: 118%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $15.3B vs. GFF: $4.75B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $15.3B. GFF’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $4.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $104.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than GFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than GFF.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а +3.60% price change this week, while GFF (@Building Products) price change was +17.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

GFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+1.54% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($15.3B) has a higher market cap than GFF($4.75B). GFF (21.88) and CSL (21.86) have similar P/E ratio . GFF YTD gains are higher at: 43.018 vs. CSL (21.171). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.25B vs. GFF (275M). CSL has more cash in the bank: 665M vs. GFF (110M). GFF has less debt than CSL: GFF (1.48B) vs CSL (2.89B). CSL has higher revenues than GFF: CSL (5.1B) vs GFF (2.53B).
CSLGFFCSL / GFF
Capitalization15.3B4.75B322%
EBITDA1.25B275M455%
Gain YTD21.17143.01849%
P/E Ratio21.8621.88100%
Revenue5.1B2.53B202%
Total Cash665M110M605%
Total Debt2.89B1.48B196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs GFF: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
GFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3744
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
449
SMR RATING
1..100
2686
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSL's Valuation (57) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (94) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (44) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (26) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (86) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (46) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (95) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLGFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XDEC43.470.03
+0.08%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mdt Bfr ETF Dec
KMLI9.41N/A
-0.01%
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
DUHP42.45-0.07
-0.16%
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
PEXL72.77-0.20
-0.28%
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
LTPZ47.66-0.32
-0.67%
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS ETF

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been closely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
-0.58%
BLDR - CSL
66%
Closely correlated
-3.63%
MAS - CSL
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
LPX - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.25%
GFF - CSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
OC - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
More