Advertisement
CSL vs GFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a StrongBuy and GFF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSL (@Building Products) experienced а -4.67% price change this week, while GFF (@Building Products) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
GFF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+0.90% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| CSL | GFF | CSL / GFF | |
| Capitalization | 14.6B | 4.24B | 345% |
| EBITDA | 1.23B | 275M | 446% |
| Gain YTD | 14.094 | 33.097 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.07 | 87.68 | 24% |
| Revenue | 4.98B | 2.53B | 197% |
| Total Cash | 771M | 110M | 701% |
| Total Debt | 2.88B | 1.48B | 196% |
CSL | GFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSL's Valuation (22) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (81) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (48) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.
CSL's SMR Rating (25) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (87) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (46) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (48) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.
| CSL | GFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 15 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EVLU | 40.89 | 0.13 | +0.32% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts Val Fac ETF | |||
| FNDE | 39.68 | 0.10 | +0.25% |
| Schwab Fundamental Emerging MarketsEqETF | |||
| USIN | 49.73 | N/A | N/A |
| WisdomTree 7-10 Year Laddered Trsy ETF | |||
| TUSI | 25.26 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF | |||
| VETZ | 19.79 | -0.10 | -0.50% |
| Academy Veteran Bond ETF | |||
CSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSL | 100% | -4.15% | ||
| BLDR - CSL | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| GFF - CSL | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| FBIN - CSL | 60% Loosely correlated | +7.71% | ||
| LII - CSL | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| MAS - CSL | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||
GFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.