Advertisement
CSL vs GFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a Hold and GFF is a Buy.
| CSL | GFF | CSL / GFF | |
| Capitalization | 12.5B | 4.22B | 296% |
| EBITDA | 1.25B | 520M | 240% |
| Gain YTD | 0.324 | 30.097 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.86 | 19.46 | 92% |
| Revenue | 5.1B | 2.56B | 199% |
| Total Cash | 665M | 110M | 605% |
| Total Debt | 2.89B | 1.34B | 216% |
CSL | GFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSL's Valuation (35) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (91) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (59) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's SMR Rating (11) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (27) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CSL (71) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.
CSL's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFF (97) in the Building Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
| CSL | GFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 73% | 18 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 4 days ago 62% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while GFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CSL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- GFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CSL (@Building Products) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while GFF (@Building Products) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
GFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-1.56% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
Advertisement
CSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.