APWC
Price
$1.37
Change
-$0.03 (-2.14%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XPON
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.03 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APWC vs XPON

Header iconAPWC vs XPON Comparison
Open Charts APWC vs XPONBanner chart's image
APWC vs XPON Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APWC vs. XPON commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APWC is a Hold and XPON is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (APWC: $1.40 vs. XPON: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: APWC and XPON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APWC: 64% vs. XPON: 103%
Market capitalization -- APWC: $57.93M vs. XPON: $6.09M
APWC [@Electrical Products] is valued at $57.93M. XPON’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $6.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $300.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $7.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APWC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXPON’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APWC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XPON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XPON is a better buy in the long-term than APWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPON’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XPON’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XPON is a better buy in the short-term than APWC.

Price Growth

APWC (@Electrical Products) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while XPON (@Electrical Products) price change was +2.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-1.10% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APWC($57.9M) has a higher market cap than XPON($6.09M). APWC has higher P/E ratio than XPON: APWC (4.68) vs XPON (0.03). XPON YTD gains are higher at: -20.490 vs. APWC (-24.661). APWC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.4M vs. XPON (-1.91M). APWC has more cash in the bank: 35.3M vs. XPON (4.29M). XPON has less debt than APWC: XPON (993K) vs APWC (44.2M). APWC has higher revenues than XPON: APWC (492M) vs XPON (9.42M).
APWCXPONAPWC / XPON
Capitalization57.9M6.09M952%
EBITDA10.4M-1.91M-545%
Gain YTD-24.661-20.490120%
P/E Ratio4.680.0318,395%
Revenue492M9.42M5,224%
Total Cash35.3M4.29M822%
Total Debt44.2M993K4,451%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APWC: Fundamental Ratings
APWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APWCXPON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XPON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRLCX26.04N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Value Retire
PGRUX10.15N/A
N/A
Principal Global Real Estate Sec R5
LVPIX120.76N/A
N/A
ProFunds Large Cap Value Inv
NCBVX25.55N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
ESCWX12.66N/A
N/A
Embark Small Cap Equity Institutional

APWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APWC and SLDP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APWC and SLDP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APWC
1D Price
Change %
APWC100%
-2.97%
SLDP - APWC
26%
Poorly correlated
+6.16%
XPON - APWC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
GWH - APWC
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.92%
HAYW - APWC
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
EAF - APWC
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.96%
More

XPON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPON has been loosely correlated with PLUG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPON jumps, then PLUG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPON
1D Price
Change %
XPON100%
+1.32%
PLUG - XPON
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
AEIS - XPON
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.04%
TGEN - XPON
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
KE - XPON
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
HUBB - XPON
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
More