It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AQMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а -1.12% price change this week, while CLH (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.23%.
AQMS is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2024.
CLH is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2024.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
|AQMS||CLH||AQMS / CLH|
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
PRICE GROWTH RATING
P/E GROWTH RATING
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLH's Valuation (81) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as AQMS (98). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's SMR Rating (50) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (97). This means that CLH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as AQMS (55). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
CLH's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Environmental Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AQMS (100). This means that CLH’s stock grew significantly faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.
1 day ago74%
1 day ago53%
1 day ago85%
1 day ago62%
1 day ago88%
1 day ago62%
1 day ago73%
1 day ago65%
1 day ago86%
1 day ago59%
1 day ago78%
1 day ago71%
10 days ago80%
11 days ago68%
14 days ago88%
3 days ago58%
3 days ago76%
1 day ago47%
1 day ago88%
1 day ago74%
A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and SRCL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and SRCL's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.