ARKG
Price
$51.30
Change
+$2.01 (+4.08%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Net Assets
2.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IXJ
Price
$103.17
Change
+$1.39 (+1.37%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Net Assets
4.32B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARKG vs IXJ

ARKG vs IXJ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 06, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) vs. iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ)

Key Takeaways

  • ARKG is an actively managed thematic ETF targeting the genomics revolution with a concentrated portfolio of approximately 30-60 holdings, while IXJ is a passively managed fund tracking a broad global healthcare index with over 100 holdings.
  • ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) carries a higher expense ratio of 0.75% compared to iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) at 0.38%, reflecting its active strategy versus IXJ's index-tracking approach.
  • ARKG focuses on innovative genomics and biotechnology companies, often smaller-cap names, resulting in higher volatility and thematic risk, whereas IXJ provides diversified exposure across pharmaceuticals, biotech, and medical devices globally with emphasis on large-cap leaders.
  • Both ETFs offer healthcare sector exposure but differ in strategy: ARKG emphasizes disruptive innovation in gene editing and molecular medicine, while IXJ delivers broad sector representation including major pharmaceutical and healthcare services firms.
  • ARKG exhibits greater concentration in U.S.-listed genomics firms with potential for higher growth but elevated risk, while IXJ balances U.S. dominance with international holdings for more stable sector-wide participation.
  • Cost efficiency and diversification favor IXJ for core allocations, whereas ARKG suits investors seeking targeted exposure to genomics advancements within the broader healthcare theme.

Introduction

Healthcare remains a resilient sector amid demographic shifts, technological advances, and evolving regulatory landscapes. ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) provide distinct avenues for investors seeking healthcare exposure. They do not compete directly but represent alternative strategies: one delivers concentrated thematic bets on genomics innovation, while the other offers broad, diversified access to global healthcare equities. This comparison highlights structural differences to help investors align choices with risk tolerance and objectives.

ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) Overview

ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in 2014 that seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in equity securities of companies advancing the genomics revolution. The strategy targets innovations in gene therapy, bioinformatics, molecular medicine, and related fields across healthcare, information technology, materials, energy, and consumer discretionary sectors. It typically holds 30-60 securities, with recent portfolios around 32 holdings concentrated in smaller- to mid-cap names. Top holdings often include 10X Genomics Inc (TXG), Twist Bioscience Corp (TWST), Tempus AI Inc (TEM), CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP), and Absci Corp (ABSI). The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.75% and features active rebalancing based on the manager's assessment of thematic opportunities. Its non-diversified structure and focus on high-conviction genomics plays distinguish it from traditional sector funds.

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) Overview

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund launched in 2001 that seeks to track the performance of the S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index. The index measures global equities in the healthcare sector, including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, life sciences, and healthcare equipment and services. The ETF holds approximately 109-114 securities, providing broad diversification with top holdings typically featuring Eli Lilly and Co (LLY), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), AbbVie Inc (ABBV), Merck & Co Inc (MRK), and UnitedHealth Group Inc (UNH). It maintains an expense ratio of 0.38% and employs representative sampling to replicate index performance. Quarterly rebalancing incorporates capping rules to limit concentration. The fund offers global exposure with significant U.S. weighting alongside developed-market names, emphasizing large-cap stability within the healthcare sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The healthcare sector benefits from long-term drivers including aging populations, rising chronic disease prevalence, and advances in precision medicine. Genomics and biotechnology innovations continue to attract capital, supported by regulatory pathways for novel therapies. Broader healthcare equities face influences from drug pricing reforms, patent expirations, and global supply chain dynamics. Capital flows into the sector often reflect defensive characteristics during economic uncertainty, while innovation themes experience periodic surges tied to clinical milestones and technological breakthroughs. Risks include regulatory scrutiny, reimbursement pressures, and competition within biotech subsectors. Both ETFs navigate this environment differently, with thematic strategies amplifying exposure to cutting-edge developments and broad indices capturing established industry leaders.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) has displayed higher volatility due to its concentrated thematic bets on smaller genomics firms, with performance closely tied to innovation cycles and sentiment toward disruptive technologies. iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) has generally exhibited more moderate fluctuations, benefiting from diversified holdings in large-cap pharmaceuticals and healthcare services that provide relative stability during sector rotations. During periods of interest rate shifts or earnings focus on established drugmakers, IXJ's positioning has offered steadier participation. ARKG's active management allows responsiveness to emerging genomics trends but introduces greater dispersion in returns compared to IXJ's index-driven approach. Relative positioning reflects ARKG's higher-beta profile versus IXJ's emphasis on broad sector resilience.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) may find the platform useful for refining their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across holdings and geographies, and passive tracking of a comprehensive healthcare index, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). Its cost efficiency and balanced risk profile align with consistent sector participation, while ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) offers differentiated thematic exposure suited to investors with higher risk tolerance for genomics-specific momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARKG vs. IXJ commentary
Oct 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARKG is a StrongBuy and IXJ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARKGIXJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ARKG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOEU24.510.72
+3.01%
Direxion Daily BA Bull 2X ETF (BOEU)
PSEP47.380.16
+0.35%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP)
SEIX23.190.03
+0.15%
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX)
FLXN24.190.03
+0.12%
Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN)
LYFX7.92N/A
N/A
Tradr 2X Long LYFT Daily ETF

ARKG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKG has been closely correlated with TXG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARKG jumps, then TXG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARKG
1D Price
Change %
ARKG100%
+4.08%
TXG - ARKG
70%
Closely correlated
+4.36%
DNA - ARKG
62%
Loosely correlated
+14.64%
FATE - ARKG
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
PHR - ARKG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
EDIT - ARKG
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
More

IXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXJ has been closely correlated with LLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXJ jumps, then LLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IXJ
1D Price
Change %
IXJ100%
+1.37%
LLY - IXJ
69%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
MRK - IXJ
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
GSK - IXJ
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
JNJ - IXJ
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
ABBV - IXJ
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More