ASA
Price
$60.83
Change
+$0.56 (+0.93%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GDX
Price
$97.10
Change
+$1.07 (+1.11%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
28.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASA vs GDX

ASA vs GDX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) vs. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX)

Key Takeaways

  • ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) operates as an actively managed closed-end fund focused on precious metals mining equities with potential for premium or discount pricing to net asset value, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) provides passive, index-tracking exposure to global gold miners.
  • GDX offers lower cost efficiency with a net expense ratio of 0.51 percent compared to ASA’s higher total expense structure exceeding 1 percent in many periods.
  • Both vehicles target the gold and precious metals mining sector but differ in structure, with GDX delivering daily liquidity and transparent pricing typical of exchange-traded funds.
  • GDX maintains a diversified portfolio of approximately 50-60 large-cap holdings, whereas ASA employs bottom-up fundamental analysis across a broader or more concentrated set of precious metals companies.
  • Investors seeking index replication, lower fees, and high liquidity may favor GDX, while those seeking active management and potential discount opportunities may consider ASA within the same thematic sector.
  • Both funds exhibit high sensitivity to gold prices, mining operational leverage, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and geopolitical developments.

Introduction

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) both provide exposure to the gold mining industry, making them relevant for investors seeking leveraged plays on gold prices through equities rather than physical bullion. They do not compete directly as one is an actively managed closed-end fund and the other a passive ETF, yet they represent alternative strategies targeting similar investor goals of sector exposure within precious metals. This comparison highlights structural differences that influence risk, cost, and positioning in varying market cycles.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) Overview

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is an actively managed closed-end fund with an investment objective of long-term capital appreciation through holdings in companies engaged in the exploration, development, or mining of precious metals and minerals. The fund maintains a policy requiring at least 80 percent of total assets in precious metals-related securities, including potential allocations to bullion or related instruments. It employs bottom-up fundamental analysis with research on company executives, site visits, and proprietary financial modeling. Holdings typically number in the dozens, with sector allocation concentrated in basic materials. Expense ratios are higher than many peers, often exceeding 1 percent when including management and other fees. As a closed-end structure, shares trade on an exchange with potential premiums or discounts to net asset value, distinguishing it from open-end vehicles.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index tracks companies primarily involved in the gold and silver mining industry. The fund holds approximately 50-60 securities, with allocations heavily weighted toward large-cap producers in basic materials. Top holdings typically include major miners such as Newmont Corp (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM), and Barrick Mining Corp (GOLD). The net expense ratio stands at 0.51 percent. GDX employs a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. As a traditional ETF, it offers intraday liquidity, transparent daily holdings disclosure, and trades at or near net asset value under normal conditions.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold mining sector remains sensitive to gold price movements, operational costs, and broader macroeconomic conditions. Key drivers include interest rate expectations, inflation trends, central bank gold purchases, and geopolitical tensions that support safe-haven demand. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards can influence production timelines. Capital flows into the sector often accelerate during periods of elevated gold prices, while rising input costs such as energy and labor can pressure margins. Both funds operate within this environment, where miner equities provide operational leverage to gold prices but also carry equity-specific risks including company execution and reserve depletion.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GDX has demonstrated strong liquidity and tight tracking to its benchmark, benefiting from its scale and passive structure during periods of sector rotation into gold equities. ASA has shown potential for outperformance or underperformance relative to peers depending on active stock selection and the impact of any discount or premium dynamics. Both vehicles exhibit elevated volatility compared to broad equity markets, with performance influenced by gold price trends, earnings cycles of major producers, and shifts in investor risk appetite. GDX generally provides more consistent exposure through its diversified large-cap focus, while ASA’s active approach may introduce greater variability based on manager decisions and valuation opportunities.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, greater liquidity, transparent index tracking, and diversified large-cap holdings, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) for investors seeking efficient sector exposure. ASA may appeal in scenarios where active management or discount opportunities align with specific objectives, yet the structural advantages of GDX support its positioning in most comparative evaluations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASA vs. GDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASA is a StrongBuy and GDX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 29B vs. ASA (1.46B). GDX has a higher annual dividend yield than ASA: GDX (13.210) vs ASA (2.008). ASA was incepted earlier than GDX: ASA (68 years) vs GDX (20 years). GDX has a higher turnover ASA (30.00) vs ASA (30.00).
ASAGDXASA / GDX
Gain YTD2.00813.21015%
Net Assets1.46B29B5%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.51-
Turnover30.0050.0060%
Yield0.090.6414%
Fund Existence68 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASAGDX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ASA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FINFX102.540.50
+0.49%
American Funds Fundamental Invs F-2
AIORX12.680.06
+0.48%
American Century International Opps R
TFFCX79.02N/A
N/A
Touchstone Focused C
DREGX58.25N/A
N/A
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Inv
ESMCX12.27N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Small Cap Equity C

ASA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASA and EMR have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASA and EMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASA
1D Price
Change %
ASA100%
+0.93%
EMR - ASA
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
SSRM - ASA
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
AGI - ASA
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
ORLA - ASA
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
+1.11%
KGC - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
WPM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
IAG - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More