ASA
Price
$63.29
Change
+$0.98 (+1.57%)
Updated
Aug 21, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GDX
Price
$102.49
Change
+$2.64 (+2.64%)
Updated
Aug 21, 12:17 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
30.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASA vs GDX

ASA vs GDX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 16, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) vs. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX)

Key Takeaways

  • ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is a closed-end fund (CEF) with an actively oriented precious metals and mining mandate, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking a global gold miners index.
  • ASA typically holds a broader and more concentrated portfolio of smaller and mid-sized precious metals companies, whereas GDX focuses on larger, established gold mining firms with approximately 60 holdings.
  • Expense ratios differ materially: GDX at 0.51% offers lower cost passive exposure, while ASA’s total expense structure is higher, reflecting its closed-end fund (CEF) characteristics and management approach.
  • Both vehicles target the precious metals mining sector but differ in liquidity profiles, with GDX providing greater daily trading volume as a traditional ETF compared to ASA’s closed-end fund (CEF) structure.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on basic materials, primarily gold and silver mining, though ASA’s mandate allows limited flexibility into other precious minerals and bullion-related instruments.
  • Relative positioning favors GDX for broad, cost-efficient diversification within large-cap miners, while ASA suits investors seeking exposure to a wider range of smaller precious metals names.

Introduction

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) both provide targeted exposure to the precious metals mining industry. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer alternative strategies within the same thematic sector. GDX delivers passive, index-based access to major global gold miners, while ASA, structured as a closed-end fund (CEF), applies a fundamental policy focused on companies engaged in precious metals exploration, mining, and processing. Investors comparing the two often seek to understand differences in cost, diversification, and structural features when allocating to gold-related equities.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) Overview

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is a closed-end fund (CEF) listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Its investment policy requires at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies involved in gold, silver, platinum, diamonds, or other precious minerals, or in related bullion and instruments. The fund maintains a portfolio of approximately 100 to 120 holdings, emphasizing precious metals equities with some concentration in smaller and mid-sized operators. Top holdings have included names such as G Mining Ventures Corp, Americas Gold and Silver Corp, and Orla Mining Ltd. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly basic materials. Expense ratios reflect management fees around 0.68% plus other costs, resulting in a higher overall structure than many passive ETFs. As a closed-end fund (CEF), ASA trades at a premium or discount to net asset value and employs a fundamental rather than purely index-driven approach.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds approximately 60 securities, concentrating on the largest global gold mining companies. Top holdings typically include Newmont Corporation, Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd, Barrick Gold Corporation, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp, and Franco-Nevada Corporation, representing a significant portion of assets. Allocations are centered in the basic materials sector, with primary exposure to gold mining equities. The net expense ratio stands at 0.51%. GDX operates as a traditional ETF with full transparency, daily creation/redemption mechanisms, and high liquidity on U.S. exchanges.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector remains influenced by gold price trends, inflation expectations, interest rate paths, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into gold-related equities often increase during periods of economic uncertainty or monetary easing. Regulatory considerations around mining permits and environmental standards continue to affect operations, while broader commodity cycles and supply constraints shape long-term dynamics. Both ASA and GDX participate in these macro drivers, with performance tied to earnings of mining companies and prevailing sentiment toward precious metals as a hedge.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has benefited from its focus on larger, more liquid miners that tend to exhibit steadier operational scale during commodity upswings. ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA), with its broader holdings in smaller names, can display greater volatility tied to individual company developments and sector rotation within precious metals. Relative positioning shows GDX offering more consistent exposure to established producers, while ASA provides differentiated access that may amplify upside in selective small-cap rallies but carries higher structural costs and potential discount/premium fluctuations inherent to closed-end funds (CEFs).

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on vehicles like ASA or GDX can leverage the platform to refine their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and liquidity characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) with moderate probability. Its lower expense ratio, passive index methodology, and focus on larger holdings provide a more scalable and transparent approach to gold miners exposure within the current sector environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASA vs. GDX commentary
Aug 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASA is a Hold and GDX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 30.2B vs. ASA (1.33B). GDX has a higher annual dividend yield than ASA: GDX (13.478) vs ASA (4.389). ASA was incepted earlier than GDX: ASA (68 years) vs GDX (20 years). GDX has a higher turnover ASA (30.00) vs ASA (30.00).
ASAGDXASA / GDX
Gain YTD4.38913.47833%
Net Assets1.33B30.2B4%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.51-
Turnover30.0050.0060%
Yield0.120.8514%
Fund Existence68 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASAGDX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVAYX30.890.14
+0.46%
SEI Large Cap Value Y (SIMT)
JDVAX16.070.02
+0.12%
JPMorgan Diversified A
NRAAX64.26-0.15
-0.23%
Neuberger Quality Equity A
RERFX64.42-0.23
-0.36%
American Funds EUPAC R-5
GSMVX20.08-0.22
-1.08%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity Instl

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
+9.42%
KGC - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
+10.25%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
+11.12%
WPM - GDX
94%
Closely correlated
+11.10%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
+7.85%
IAG - GDX
92%
Closely correlated
+8.41%
More