ASA
Price
$60.83
Change
+$0.56 (+0.93%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GDXJ
Price
$125.41
Change
+$1.31 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
9.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASA vs GDXJ

ASA vs GDXJ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) vs. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ)

Key Takeaways

  • ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is an actively managed closed-end fund (CEF) focused on precious metals mining companies through bottom-up fundamental research, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index.
  • ASA typically maintains a concentrated portfolio with around 100 holdings and higher expense ratios near 1.88%, whereas GDXJ holds approximately 120 securities with a lower net expense ratio of 0.52%.
  • Both funds target junior and emerging gold and silver miners, providing leveraged equity exposure to gold price movements, but ASA's active strategy allows for selective positioning based on valuation and company fundamentals.
  • ASA often trades at a discount to its net asset value (NAV), offering potential value opportunities but introducing premium/discount volatility, while GDXJ trades close to NAV with higher liquidity typical of ETFs.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on basic materials, primarily gold mining, with limited diversification outside precious metals equities.
  • GDXJ provides broader rules-based diversification and lower costs, while ASA emphasizes active security selection within the same thematic space.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to junior gold miners often compare ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) due to their shared focus on small- and mid-capitalization companies in the precious metals sector. These vehicles do not compete directly as one is an actively managed closed-end fund and the other a passive ETF, yet both deliver equity exposure to gold and silver mining firms. The comparison helps clarify differences in structure, costs, and strategy for those targeting commodity-linked growth within the basic materials sector.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) Overview

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is a closed-end fund (CEF) established in 1958 that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in companies engaged in the exploration, development, or mining of precious metals and minerals. It employs active, bottom-up fundamental analysis, including site visits and executive meetings. The fund typically holds around 100-110 securities, with top positions including G Mining Ventures Corp, Americas Gold and Silver Corp, Orla Mining Ltd, Equinox Gold Corp, and Predictive Discovery Ltd. Sector allocation is concentrated in basic materials, focused on gold with some silver and diversified miners. Its gross expense ratio stands at approximately 1.88%, reflecting management and operating costs. As a CEF, it may trade at a persistent discount to NAV and offers semi-annual distributions.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) launched in 2009 that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index targets small-capitalization companies deriving at least 50% of revenues from gold and/or silver mining or with projects expected to meet that threshold. GDXJ holds approximately 120 securities, with leading positions in Equinox Gold Corp, Evolution Mining Ltd, Alamos Gold Inc, Endeavour Mining PLC, and Coeur Mining Inc. Allocation remains heavily weighted toward basic materials, primarily gold miners across Canada, Australia, and other regions. The net expense ratio is 0.52%, and the fund features annual distributions with high liquidity as a standard ETF structure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The junior gold miners sector benefits from gold price trends driven by macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, inflation hedging, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into precious metals equities often accelerate during periods of economic uncertainty or monetary easing. Regulatory environments in key mining jurisdictions like Canada and Australia influence project development timelines, while rising operational costs and permitting challenges pose ongoing risks. Both funds capture equity beta to gold prices, with junior miners typically exhibiting higher volatility than senior producers due to their earlier-stage assets and leverage to commodity movements.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) have demonstrated sensitivity to gold price fluctuations and sector rotation into commodities. GDXJ's rules-based approach has provided consistent exposure across a larger number of holdings, supporting relative stability in diversified portfolios. ASA's active management has allowed selective overweighting in specific mining names, though its closed-end structure introduces additional NAV discount dynamics that can amplify or dampen returns versus underlying holdings. Relative positioning favors lower-cost, liquid vehicles like GDXJ during broad sector uptrends, while ASA may appeal in environments where fundamental stock selection identifies undervalued juniors.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener for tailored insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural factors including lower expense ratios, greater liquidity, and rules-based diversification across a comparable thematic universe, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) for most investors seeking efficient junior gold miner exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASA vs. GDXJ commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASA is a StrongBuy and GDXJ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDXJ has more net assets: 9.26B vs. ASA (1.46B). GDXJ has a higher annual dividend yield than ASA: GDXJ (10.221) vs ASA (2.008). ASA was incepted earlier than GDXJ: ASA (68 years) vs GDXJ (17 years). GDXJ has a higher turnover ASA (30.00) vs ASA (30.00).
ASAGDXJASA / GDXJ
Gain YTD2.00810.22120%
Net Assets1.46B9.26B16%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.52-
Turnover30.0036.0083%
Yield0.092.074%
Fund Existence68 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASAGDXJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ASA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSMD33.410.27
+0.83%
Congress SMid Growth ETF
PRFZ53.610.36
+0.68%
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
BKCI52.490.05
+0.10%
BNY Mellon Concentrated Internatnl ETF
DUG14.11-0.05
-0.35%
ProShares UltraShort Energy
ALBG5.39-0.42
-7.15%
Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF

ASA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASA and EMR have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASA and EMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASA
1D Price
Change %
ASA100%
+0.93%
EMR - ASA
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
SSRM - ASA
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
AGI - ASA
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
ORLA - ASA
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
+1.06%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
FSM - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
CGAU - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
More