ASA
Price
$63.29
Change
+$0.98 (+1.57%)
Updated
Aug 21, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SILJ
Price
$31.98
Change
+$0.35 (+1.11%)
Updated
Aug 21, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
4.17B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASA vs SILJ

ASA vs SILJ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) vs. Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ)

Key Takeaways

  • ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) is a closed-end fund focused on precious metals and mining companies with at least 80% of assets in gold, silver, and related securities, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is an exchange-traded fund tracking an index of junior silver mining companies.
  • ASA typically holds around 111 securities with a higher expense ratio near 1.88%, offering broader precious metals exposure including gold-dominant holdings, whereas SILJ holds approximately 65-67 positions with a lower 0.69% expense ratio and concentrates on smaller silver-focused miners.
  • Both funds provide equity exposure to the mining sector rather than direct commodity ownership, introducing operational and company-specific risks alongside precious metals price movements.
  • ASA features a more diversified holdings profile across gold and silver miners, while SILJ emphasizes higher-volatility junior silver producers with potential for amplified returns in favorable silver price environments.
  • Structural differences include ASA’s closed-end structure, which can trade at premiums or discounts to net asset value, versus SILJ’s standard ETF structure with intraday liquidity.
  • Investors comparing the two should weigh ASA’s broader precious metals mandate and higher costs against SILJ’s targeted junior silver strategy and lower expense ratio.

Introduction

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) both target investors seeking exposure to precious metals mining equities. They do not compete directly as one emphasizes a closed-end approach to gold and broader precious minerals while the other focuses on junior silver miners through an ETF structure. The comparison remains relevant for those evaluating sector exposure within precious metals, where differing risk profiles, cost structures, and thematic tilts can influence portfolio allocation decisions amid fluctuating commodity cycles.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) Overview

ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) operates as a closed-end fund with a mandate requiring at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies engaged in the exploration, mining, or processing of gold, silver, platinum, diamonds, or other precious minerals, as well as direct bullion holdings. It typically maintains around 111 holdings with an annual portfolio turnover of approximately 30%. Top holdings often include names such as G Mining Ventures Corp, Americas Gold and Silver Corp, and Orla Mining Ltd. The fund’s expense ratio stands near 1.88%, reflecting its closed-end structure and management approach. ASA provides differentiated access to precious metals equities with a notable gold emphasis and does not track a specific index in the manner of passive ETFs.

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) Overview

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the total return performance of the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index before fees and expenses. It holds approximately 65-67 securities, primarily smaller and mid-sized companies involved in silver mining and exploration. Top holdings commonly feature Hecla Mining Co (HL), First Majestic Silver Corp (AG), and KGHM Polska Miedz SA, with the top 10 representing over 55% of assets. The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.69% and follows a rules-based index methodology with periodic rebalancing. SILJ offers targeted exposure to the junior silver mining segment, which tends to exhibit greater sensitivity to silver price movements compared with larger producers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector remains influenced by gold and silver price trends, global economic uncertainty, interest rate expectations, and supply constraints. Capital flows into mining equities often respond to inflation hedging demand and geopolitical developments that support safe-haven buying. Regulatory considerations around mining permits and environmental standards, along with capital expenditure cycles at operating companies, shape the operating environment. Both funds face risks from commodity volatility, operational challenges at mining sites, and broader equity market sentiment toward cyclical materials sectors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) has delivered exposure tied to a mix of gold and silver mining equities, with performance influenced by the relative strength of larger precious metals producers. Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has shown greater sensitivity to silver price rallies due to its junior miner focus, which can amplify gains or losses during sector rotations. Relative positioning highlights ASA’s broader diversification across precious minerals versus SILJ’s concentrated silver junior tilt, resulting in differing volatility profiles and correlations to underlying metal prices over multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on funds like ASA or SILJ can leverage this platform for additional analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) due to its lower expense ratio, standard ETF liquidity profile, and focused positioning within the silver mining segment amid ongoing commodity interest. ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited (ASA) offers compelling broader precious metals diversification but carries a higher cost structure and closed-end characteristics that introduce additional premium or discount considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASA vs. SILJ commentary
Aug 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASA is a Hold and SILJ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SILJ has more net assets: 4.17B vs. ASA (1.33B). SILJ has a higher annual dividend yield than ASA: SILJ (13.553) vs ASA (4.389). ASA was incepted earlier than SILJ: ASA (68 years) vs SILJ (14 years). SILJ has a higher turnover ASA (30.00) vs ASA (30.00).
ASASILJASA / SILJ
Gain YTD4.38913.55332%
Net Assets1.33B4.17B32%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.69-
Turnover30.0047.0064%
Yield0.122.305%
Fund Existence68 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASASILJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SILJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVAYX30.890.14
+0.46%
SEI Large Cap Value Y (SIMT)
JDVAX16.070.02
+0.12%
JPMorgan Diversified A
NRAAX64.26-0.15
-0.23%
Neuberger Quality Equity A
RERFX64.42-0.23
-0.36%
American Funds EUPAC R-5
GSMVX20.08-0.22
-1.08%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity Instl

SILJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILJ
1D Price
Change %
SILJ100%
+9.55%
PAAS - SILJ
93%
Closely correlated
+7.94%
CDE - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
+13.07%
WPM - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
+11.10%
SKE - SILJ
88%
Closely correlated
+9.81%
OR - SILJ
87%
Closely correlated
+8.02%
More