Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) and First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (FCNCA) represent key players in the regional banking sector, offering investors exposure to lending, deposits, and fee-based services amid evolving interest rates and economic shifts. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning to aid traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors prioritizing dividends or scale. With both navigating deposit growth and net interest income (NII, revenue from interest-earning assets minus interest expenses) pressures, understanding their relative strengths helps in portfolio diversification within financials.
Associated Banc-Corp, headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, operates as a bank holding company providing retail banking, commercial lending, and wealth management primarily in the Midwest. In recent market activity, ASB shares have exhibited strong upward momentum, with year-to-date gains around 10.71% and one-year returns exceeding 46%. Trading near $28 with a 52-week range of $19.62 to $29.52, the stock benefits from a attractive valuation (P/E of 10.20) and robust dividend yield of 3.34%. Sentiment has been bolstered by a Q4 2025 earnings beat ($0.80 EPS versus $0.70 expected) and quarterly dividend declarations of $0.24 per share, alongside leadership enhancements in key markets. Broader factors like stable net interest margins and controlled non-performing loans (NPLs, loans not generating principal or interest payments) have supported performance amid sector volatility.
First Citizens BancShares, Inc., based in Raleigh, North Carolina, is a diversified financial holding company with a national footprint, enhanced by strategic acquisitions like Silicon Valley Bridge Bank. FCNCA shares trade around $2,061, within a 52-week range of $1,623.76 to $2,232.21, posting year-to-date returns of 3.85% and one-year gains of 20.59%. The stock's P/E stands at 12.47 with a modest dividend yield of 0.41%. Recent performance reflects resilience, including a Q4 2025 earnings beat despite a 6.5% revenue dip to $2.25 billion, with net interest income holding steady at $1.72 billion. Dividend declarations and share repurchases underscore capital return focus, while high cash reserves ($21.37 billion) provide liquidity buffers. Investor sentiment remains positive ahead of upcoming earnings, driven by scale advantages and return on equity (ROE, profitability relative to shareholders' equity) of 9.92%.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from short-term scalping to longer-term trend following—with performance stats including annualized returns from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates of 53.91% to 87.72%, and profit factors highlighting risk-adjusted gains. Examples feature high performers on semiconductors like SOXL (+97.21% return, 68.54% win rate) and gold producers, alongside bots targeting investment banks and industrials. Updated for current market conditions, this section spotlights bots best suited to volatility and sector rotations. Traders can explore these for copy trading to leverage AI-driven signals across various timeframes and styles.
Both ASB and FCNCA operate in regional banking, focusing on commercial and consumer loans, but differ in scale: FCNCA's $24.39 billion market cap dwarfs ASB's $5.32 billion, enabling broader diversification post-M&A (mergers and acquisitions). Growth drivers for ASB include Midwest deposit expansion and fee income, while FCNCA leverages national lending and high cash positions. Recent momentum favors ASB with superior YTD and one-year returns, contrasted by FCNCA's steadier beta (0.65 versus 0.78). Risk factors encompass interest rate sensitivity affecting NII for both, though ASB's higher dividend (3.34% yield) offers income edge over FCNCA's growth-oriented repurchases. Sector exposure ties them to financials, but ASB garners stronger value sentiment via lower P/E, while FCNCA appeals for stability and ROE.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward ASB over FCNCA, citing consistent recent price trends, elevated dividend yield, and compelling valuation metrics in a yield-seeking environment. ASB's outperformance in momentum and relative affordability positions it probabilistically better for near-term upside, though FCNCA's scale may shine in downturns. This assessment reflects observable patterns rather than guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCNCA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCNCA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while FCNCA (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.60%.
ASB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
FCNCA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| ASB | FCNCA | ASB / FCNCA | |
| Capitalization | 5.65B | 24.2B | 23% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.076 | -2.585 | -699% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.20 | 12.02 | 85% |
| Revenue | 1.52B | 9.27B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 465M | 801M | 58% |
| Total Debt | 4.01B | 34.1B | 12% |
ASB | FCNCA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASB's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCNCA (76). This means that ASB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCNCA’s over the last 12 months.
FCNCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (42). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.
FCNCA's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (22). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.
ASB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCNCA (49). This means that ASB’s stock grew similarly to FCNCA’s over the last 12 months.
FCNCA's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASB (97). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASB’s over the last 12 months.
| ASB | FCNCA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 13 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCA has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCNCA jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCNCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCNCA | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| ZION - FCNCA | 77% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| FNB - FCNCA | 76% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| ASB - FCNCA | 74% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| ONB - FCNCA | 72% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| FULT - FCNCA | 71% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
More | ||||