ASB
Price
$29.88
Change
+$0.50 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.64B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCNCA
Price
$2111.45
Change
+$26.46 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.21B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASB vs FCNCA

ASB vs FCNCA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) vs. First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (FCNCA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ASB has delivered stronger year-to-date gains of approximately 10.71% compared to FCNCA's 3.85%, reflecting robust recent momentum in regional banking.
  • Associated Banc-Corp offers a higher dividend yield of 3.34%, appealing to income-focused investors, versus FCNCA's 0.41%.
  • ASB trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 10.20, suggesting relative value, compared to FCNCA's 12.47.
  • FCNCA boasts a significantly larger market capitalization of $24.39 billion versus ASB's $5.32 billion, providing greater scale and stability.
  • Both stocks have shown positive one-year returns, with ASB at 46.82% outperforming FCNCA's 20.59%.
  • Recent earnings beats for both, but ASB's higher yield and momentum position it favorably in current market conditions.

Introduction

Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) and First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (FCNCA) represent key players in the regional banking sector, offering investors exposure to lending, deposits, and fee-based services amid evolving interest rates and economic shifts. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning to aid traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors prioritizing dividends or scale. With both navigating deposit growth and net interest income (NII, revenue from interest-earning assets minus interest expenses) pressures, understanding their relative strengths helps in portfolio diversification within financials.

ASB Overview and Recent Performance

Associated Banc-Corp, headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, operates as a bank holding company providing retail banking, commercial lending, and wealth management primarily in the Midwest. In recent market activity, ASB shares have exhibited strong upward momentum, with year-to-date gains around 10.71% and one-year returns exceeding 46%. Trading near $28 with a 52-week range of $19.62 to $29.52, the stock benefits from a attractive valuation (P/E of 10.20) and robust dividend yield of 3.34%. Sentiment has been bolstered by a Q4 2025 earnings beat ($0.80 EPS versus $0.70 expected) and quarterly dividend declarations of $0.24 per share, alongside leadership enhancements in key markets. Broader factors like stable net interest margins and controlled non-performing loans (NPLs, loans not generating principal or interest payments) have supported performance amid sector volatility.

FCNCA Overview and Recent Performance

First Citizens BancShares, Inc., based in Raleigh, North Carolina, is a diversified financial holding company with a national footprint, enhanced by strategic acquisitions like Silicon Valley Bridge Bank. FCNCA shares trade around $2,061, within a 52-week range of $1,623.76 to $2,232.21, posting year-to-date returns of 3.85% and one-year gains of 20.59%. The stock's P/E stands at 12.47 with a modest dividend yield of 0.41%. Recent performance reflects resilience, including a Q4 2025 earnings beat despite a 6.5% revenue dip to $2.25 billion, with net interest income holding steady at $1.72 billion. Dividend declarations and share repurchases underscore capital return focus, while high cash reserves ($21.37 billion) provide liquidity buffers. Investor sentiment remains positive ahead of upcoming earnings, driven by scale advantages and return on equity (ROE, profitability relative to shareholders' equity) of 9.92%.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from short-term scalping to longer-term trend following—with performance stats including annualized returns from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates of 53.91% to 87.72%, and profit factors highlighting risk-adjusted gains. Examples feature high performers on semiconductors like SOXL (+97.21% return, 68.54% win rate) and gold producers, alongside bots targeting investment banks and industrials. Updated for current market conditions, this section spotlights bots best suited to volatility and sector rotations. Traders can explore these for copy trading to leverage AI-driven signals across various timeframes and styles.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both ASB and FCNCA operate in regional banking, focusing on commercial and consumer loans, but differ in scale: FCNCA's $24.39 billion market cap dwarfs ASB's $5.32 billion, enabling broader diversification post-M&A (mergers and acquisitions). Growth drivers for ASB include Midwest deposit expansion and fee income, while FCNCA leverages national lending and high cash positions. Recent momentum favors ASB with superior YTD and one-year returns, contrasted by FCNCA's steadier beta (0.65 versus 0.78). Risk factors encompass interest rate sensitivity affecting NII for both, though ASB's higher dividend (3.34% yield) offers income edge over FCNCA's growth-oriented repurchases. Sector exposure ties them to financials, but ASB garners stronger value sentiment via lower P/E, while FCNCA appeals for stability and ROE.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward ASB over FCNCA, citing consistent recent price trends, elevated dividend yield, and compelling valuation metrics in a yield-seeking environment. ASB's outperformance in momentum and relative affordability positions it probabilistically better for near-term upside, though FCNCA's scale may shine in downturns. This assessment reflects observable patterns rather than guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ASB vs. FCNCA commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASB is a Buy and FCNCA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ASB: $29.88 vs. FCNCA: $2086.33)
Brand notoriety: ASB and FCNCA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASB: 89% vs. FCNCA: 96%
Market capitalization -- ASB: $5.64B vs. FCNCA: $23.95B
ASB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.64B. FCNCA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCNCA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCNCA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASB and FCNCA are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCNCA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCNCA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCA is a better buy in the short-term than ASB.

Price Growth

ASB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while FCNCA (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

FCNCA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNCA($24.2B) has a higher market cap than ASB($5.65B). FCNCA has higher P/E ratio than ASB: FCNCA (12.02) vs ASB (10.20). ASB YTD gains are higher at: 18.076 vs. FCNCA (-2.585). FCNCA has more cash in the bank: 801M vs. ASB (465M). ASB has less debt than FCNCA: ASB (4.01B) vs FCNCA (34.1B). FCNCA has higher revenues than ASB: FCNCA (9.27B) vs ASB (1.52B).
ASBFCNCAASB / FCNCA
Capitalization5.65B24.2B23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.076-2.585-699%
P/E Ratio10.2012.0285%
Revenue1.52B9.27B16%
Total Cash465M801M58%
Total Debt4.01B34.1B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASB vs FCNCA: Fundamental Ratings
ASB
FCNCA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
299
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4230
SMR RATING
1..100
228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9740
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASB's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCNCA (76). This means that ASB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCNCA’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (42). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCA's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (22). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.

ASB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCNCA (49). This means that ASB’s stock grew similarly to FCNCA’s over the last 12 months.

FCNCA's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASB (97). This means that FCNCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASBFCNCA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCNCA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WHF6.550.10
+1.63%
WhiteHorse Finance
NMR9.010.04
+0.45%
Nomura Holdings
CURX0.28N/A
-0.86%
Curanex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
OSIS219.26-3.52
-1.58%
OSI Systems
CGBD10.73-0.23
-2.05%
Carlyle Secured Lending

FCNCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCA has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCNCA jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCA
1D Price
Change %
FCNCA100%
+0.71%
ZION - FCNCA
77%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
FNB - FCNCA
76%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
ASB - FCNCA
74%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
ONB - FCNCA
72%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
FULT - FCNCA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
More