Advertisement
ASC vs NAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASC is a Buy and NAT is a Buy.
| ASC | NAT | ASC / NAT | |
| Capitalization | 763M | 1.58B | 48% |
| EBITDA | 153M | 158M | 97% |
| Gain YTD | 90.061 | 142.256 | 63% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.26 | 12.86 | 56% |
| Revenue | 368M | 370M | 99% |
| Total Cash | 48.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 35M | 407M | 9% |
ASC | NAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NAT's Valuation (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (4). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASC (37). This means that NAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's SMR Rating (38) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (54). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (37). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.
ASC's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (98). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.
| ASC | NAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 70% | 18 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ASC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +6.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
NAT is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+0.81% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.12% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
Advertisement
ASC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASC has been closely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASC jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.
NAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.