ASC
Price
$18.67
Change
+$0.21 (+1.14%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
762.7M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ECO
Price
$76.15
Change
+$3.23 (+4.43%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.94B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASC vs ECO

ASC vs ECO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASC vs. ECO commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASC is a Buy and ECO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($2.94B) has a higher market cap than ASC($763M). ASC (7.26) and ECO (7.06) have similar P/E ratio . ECO YTD gains are higher at: 162.558 vs. ASC (90.061). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 487M vs. ASC (153M). ECO has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. ASC (48.1M). ASC has less debt than ECO: ASC (35M) vs ECO (722M). ECO has higher revenues than ASC: ECO (706M) vs ASC (368M).
ASCECOASC / ECO
Capitalization763M2.94B26%
EBITDA153M487M31%
Gain YTD90.061162.55855%
P/E Ratio7.267.06103%
Revenue368M706M52%
Total Cash48.1M223M22%
Total Debt35M722M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASC vs ECO: Fundamental Ratings
ASC
ECO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4043
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
372
SMR RATING
1..100
5419
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8591
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECO's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ASC (4) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASC (37) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASC (54) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ASC (37) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ECO (91) in the null industry. This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to ECO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCECO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (ASC: $18.67 vs. ECO: $76.15)
Brand notoriety: ASC and ECO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASC: 99% vs. ECO: 134%
Market capitalization -- ASC: $762.7M vs. ECO: $2.94B
ASC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $762.7M. ECO’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $1.87K to $32.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while ECO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ASC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than ASC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ECO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASC is a better buy in the short-term than ECO.

Price Growth

ASC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while ECO (@Marine Shipping) price change was +6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

ECO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.81% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ASC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFRU9.180.82
+9.75%
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
VUSG65.190.56
+0.87%
Vanguard Wellington U.S. Gr Actv ETF
DNL45.140.35
+0.78%
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Gr ETF
RWM13.95-0.04
-0.29%
ProShares Short Russell2000
BHYB53.40-0.27
-0.51%
Xtrackers USD High Yld BB-B ex Fin ETF

ASC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASC has been closely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASC jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASC
1D Price
Change %
ASC100%
+1.14%
HAFN - ASC
74%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
ECO - ASC
70%
Closely correlated
+4.43%
NAT - ASC
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
SFL - ASC
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
NMM - ASC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
+4.43%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
+3.47%
ASC - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
HAFN - ECO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
NMM - ECO
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
SFL - ECO
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.94%
More