ASC
Price
$15.83
Change
-$0.56 (-3.42%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
645.91M
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ECO
Price
$54.20
Change
-$0.74 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASC vs ECO

ASC vs ECO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASC vs. ECO commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASC is a StrongBuy and ECO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ASC: $15.83 vs. ECO: $54.20)
Brand notoriety: ASC and ECO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASC: 95% vs. ECO: 52%
Market capitalization -- ASC: $645.91M vs. ECO: $2.07B
ASC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $645.91M. ECO’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileECO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ASC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than ASC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ECO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ASC and ECO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ASC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +4.01% price change this week, while ECO (@Marine Shipping) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

ECO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-0.09% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($2.07B) has a higher market cap than ASC($646M). ASC has higher P/E ratio than ECO: ASC (11.99) vs ECO (9.53). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 71.527 vs. ASC (53.941). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 283M vs. ASC (101M). ECO has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. ASC (47.2M). ASC has less debt than ECO: ASC (105M) vs ECO (683M). ECO has higher revenues than ASC: ECO (482M) vs ASC (324M).
ASCECOASC / ECO
Capitalization646M2.07B31%
EBITDA101M283M36%
Gain YTD53.94171.52775%
P/E Ratio11.999.53126%
Revenue324M482M67%
Total Cash47.2M126M37%
Total Debt105M683M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASC vs ECO: Fundamental Ratings
ASC
ECO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1231
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
496
SMR RATING
1..100
7728
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECO's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as ASC (11) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASC (49) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASC (77) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ASC (41) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ECO (49) in the null industry. This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to ECO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCECO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PREIX196.62N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500
ABWYX16.97N/A
N/A
AB All Market Total Return Advisor
FMGGX50.53N/A
N/A
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth R6
TSLAX6.20N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Value A
NESNX63.46-0.08
-0.13%
Natixis US Equity Opportunities N

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-1.35%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
HAFN - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
ASC - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
NMM - ECO
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
SFL - ECO
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More